Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GraceG
Another bad amendment was the one providing for direct popular election of Senators. The House of Rep's. was to be directly elected and represent the people, while the Senate was to represent the respective States.

Considering the way most of them vote, one could make a case that the Amendment providing the vote for women was a mistake also. (Ducking and running for fallout shelter)

17 posted on 12/08/2009 3:37:39 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: hellbender

>> Another bad amendment was the one providing for direct popular election of Senators. The House of Rep’s. was to be directly elected and represent the people, while the Senate was to represent the respective States.

Considering the way most of them vote, one could make a case that the Amendment providing the vote for women was a mistake also. (Ducking and running for fallout shelter) <<

Agreed, the Senators should be elected by the state representatives and representing the states.


23 posted on 12/08/2009 3:44:18 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: hellbender
Another bad amendment was the one providing for direct popular election of Senators.

There were good reasons for the amendment. Basically the senate was in the hands of the various states' political machines. There were a number of bribery scandals--it's easy to buy a senate seat when you only need to swing a handful of votes in a state house. And by the time the amendment passed, the majority of states, on their own, had already gone to some form of a direct election system.

30 posted on 12/08/2009 3:53:12 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson