More importantly, it confirms he was born to a father who was a British subject and, therefore, he is ineligible to be president.
From the article:
“The confirmation that a British subject was the legal, declared father of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., establishes more firmly the charge that he is ineligible for office, since to be president the U.S. Constitution requires that one be a natural born citizen, and no natural born citizen can have a foreigner as a parent.”
“The confirmation that a British subject was the legal, declared father of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., establishes more firmly the charge that he is ineligible for office, since to be president the U.S. Constitution requires that one be a natural born citizen, and no natural born citizen can have a foreigner as a parent.”
For some reason, this factor is being ignored yet it’s the simplest one to explain and defend.
Based on what clause of the Constitution or what rule of law?