Skip to comments.
House Ban on Acorn Grants Is Ruled Unconstitutional
The New York Times ^
| 12-11-09
| JANIE LORBER
Posted on 12/11/2009 7:22:05 PM PST by GOP_Lady
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
1
posted on
12/11/2009 7:22:06 PM PST
by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
Victory for the corrupt left-wingers.
2
posted on
12/11/2009 7:28:44 PM PST
by
cranked
To: GOP_Lady
That is the most twisted interpretation of a bill of attainder I have ever read. If congress refuses to continue funding something, they are punishing them after the fact.
Where was this judge when congress refused to fund Reagan’s military budget?
3
posted on
12/11/2009 7:29:13 PM PST
by
Bertram3
To: GOP_Lady
ACORN and their attorneys obviously ‘judge shopped’ and picked the venue/judge who’d be most favorable to them. For a judge to override another equal branch of govt is cause alone for an appeal.
4
posted on
12/11/2009 7:31:28 PM PST
by
EDINVA
To: GOP_Lady
Don’t federal contracts have a rescission for cause clause in them? If not, the k writer missed law school. The cause would be the illegal acts of ACORN shown in various videos.
5
posted on
12/11/2009 7:36:56 PM PST
by
RicocheT
To: GOP_Lady
A bill of attainder, as generally known, is an act that punishes a PERSON via a very selective CRIMINAL statute.
Appeal time.
6
posted on
12/11/2009 7:40:46 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(Never kick Dems when they're down. Wait 'till they're 1/2 way back up. You get much better leverage!)
To: EDINVA
ACORN did not judge shop. They went to the judge that Obama, Pelosi, and Reed told them to. This was part of the deal that Pelosi, Reid, and Obama made with ACORN after the videos broke.
7
posted on
12/11/2009 7:40:54 PM PST
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: GOP_Lady
Lack of reward is not punishment. But of course the corrupt judge new that.
8
posted on
12/11/2009 7:45:54 PM PST
by
The Duke
(Socialism is cool until somebody loses their paycheck.)
To: GOP_Lady
Dongress gives and Congress takes away.
Absolutely Constitutional.
To do otherwise would be an abrogation of their duty, thus it would be....unconstitutional.
9
posted on
12/11/2009 7:47:13 PM PST
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: GOP_Lady
I have feeling this judge has a colorful record.
10
posted on
12/11/2009 7:47:16 PM PST
by
BallyBill
(WARNING:Taking me serious could cause stress related illness.)
To: MindBender26
Seems odd to me that companies would be protected from bills of attainder, and not just natural persons, but is there even any case law on this?
To: FlingWingFlyer; altair; stephenjohnbanker; little jeremiah; ~Kim4VRWC's~; voteNRA; Admiral_Zeon; ...
NY Times’ take on the issue.
To: MikeGranby
To: BallyBill
I have feeling this judge has a colorful record.
14
posted on
12/11/2009 7:54:53 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(Obama, Hitler, Stalin: Who are 3 people nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.)
To: GOP_Lady
So now, ACORN is federally funded in perpetuity, by court order? We can never defund them. Because it’s unconstitutional. Oh, this is rich. The words “absurd result” come to mind.
15
posted on
12/11/2009 7:56:39 PM PST
by
LikeLight
(www.IsThereALawyerInTheChurch.com)
To: GOP_Lady
tar...feathers....pitchforks....
16
posted on
12/11/2009 7:56:40 PM PST
by
mo
To: GOP_Lady
I wonder how many whore houses ACORN runs - they seems to know a lot of tricks... (no pun intended).
17
posted on
12/11/2009 7:58:58 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(Journalists as BaghdadBobLite - Global Warming Scientists as ElmerGantry - what's happening?)
To: GOP_Lady
I guess ACORN is buried somewhere in the Constitution.
18
posted on
12/11/2009 8:13:49 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: SkyDancer
This explains it all: Nina Gershon (born 1940 in Chicago, Illinois) is a federal district judge in the Eastern District of New York. She was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 at the recommendation of Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
19
posted on
12/11/2009 8:19:43 PM PST
by
coop223
To: EDINVA
They will have a much harder time with the appeals court.
20
posted on
12/11/2009 8:23:51 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson