Replies

To: sam_paine

I appreciate the effort, but note that Obama’s chart only goes to July. So it’s five months out of date.

45 posted on 12/12/2009 6:58:22 AM PST by library user

To: library user

True. but the trends to compare to are what I'm trying to reference.

The absolute numbers don't mean anything to me.

The overall trends now relative to other terms is what interests me.

50 posted on 12/12/2009 7:00:25 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)

To: library user; Scanian

I appreciate the effort, but note that Obama’s chart only goes to July. So it’s five months out of date.

Even more effort....just for you! =)

92 posted on 12/12/2009 7:33:08 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)

To: library user; Scanian; Red in Blue PA; Texas Fossil

What is the point is posting Gallup Poll? One of the most biased toward Obozo.

LOL. Rasmussen polls didn't exist before Clinton. The only way to compare these trends to previous terms is via polls that also existed back then.

What are you looking for, cherry-picked hockey-stick polling data from the University of East Anglia!?!! LOL!

I think this trend is more informative than Scott's "strongly this - strongly that" daily number.

If Scott had taken data for Obama/Carter or Bush/Truman then I'd use that data!

119 posted on 12/12/2009 8:02:03 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794