Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LSU board approves seizing land for new teaching hospital
WWL TV ^ | 12/11/09 | WWL TV

Posted on 12/12/2009 7:27:35 AM PST by chemicalman

BATON ROUGE, La. -- LSU's governing board has agreed to the expropriation of property to build a new public teaching hospital in New Orleans and a nearby new veterans hospital.

Without objection Friday, the LSU Board of Supervisors approved the use of expropriation. The resolution allows state officials working on the projects to seek a court order to seize private property if the owners refuse to sell. A judge would decide the purchase price the state must pay.

More than 450 separately-owned parcels of land are located in the footprint of the planned U.S. Veterans Affairs' hospital and the $1.2 billion public teaching facility to replace Charity Hospital. State officials say eight pieces of property have been purchased so far.

Jerry Jones, whose office supervises state-funded construction projects, says nobody has outright refused to sell their land for the hospital projects yet.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: louisiana; lsu; neworleans; seizure
A judge would decide the purchase price the state must pay.

And it better be better than market value, if one has to find another place to live, pay for moving, additional loss, etc.

1 posted on 12/12/2009 7:27:35 AM PST by chemicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chemicalman

it will be for less than market value, always is when done on this scale


2 posted on 12/12/2009 7:31:57 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman

Is this being built under sea level?


3 posted on 12/12/2009 7:36:05 AM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar. ---- "OBAMA: THE GREAT MISTAKE OF 2008")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

If it’s in the same area where the VA and LSU hospitals are located, then yes, it is near to below sea level.


4 posted on 12/12/2009 7:43:51 AM PST by chemicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I don't know about your laws in your state but in Michigan when they buy property from a home owner for highway purposes, it is appraised, reviewed, and then the owner is given 125% of market value. Plus moving costs and other incidental costs. They pay nothing on the closing statement. And the appraisals are very liberal.
5 posted on 12/12/2009 7:55:43 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division

Thats when they buy a few homes. Ihope Im wrong but the trend I’ve seen is to screw the homeowners.


6 posted on 12/12/2009 8:04:54 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman

I used to live in this area during the 1960s, and it has become pretty blighted in the last 20 years. However, there are a few buildings that I would hate to see gone, such as the Deutches Haus, a German lodge building where parties are held. My Mom aned Dad had their wedding reception there in 1947, so it would be mostly sentimental reasons for me.

But this is a commercial area now, and the homeowners should receive fair market value for commercial property, in my opinion.


7 posted on 12/12/2009 8:18:21 AM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
I don't have problems with imminent domain for real public uses. Hospitals, especially for veterans, are worthy public uses.

The owners should receive 125% of market value and reasonable expenses.
8 posted on 12/12/2009 8:23:09 AM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

Well they shouldn’t be building it in New Orleans again. The should move to higher ground !!!

I guess it is true, we are still ‘STUCK ON STUPID’.


9 posted on 12/12/2009 8:46:29 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
If it’s in the same area where the VA and LSU hospitals are located, then yes, it is near to below sea level.

A teaching hospital?

Underwater Brain Surgery?

10 posted on 12/12/2009 8:53:52 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

As long as they rebuild San Francisco after an earthquake, then why shouldn’t New Orleans rebuild?


11 posted on 12/12/2009 8:57:40 AM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: murron
As long as they rebuild San Francisco after an earthquake, then why shouldn’t New Orleans rebuild?

Isn't this a little more than rebuilding? Why not spend the money in a safer location within the region?

12 posted on 12/12/2009 9:09:26 AM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar. ---- "OBAMA: THE GREAT MISTAKE OF 2008")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

Because this is near the downtown area, where it makes sense to put the hospital. I believe the tone of some of the posts is that New Orleans shouldn’t rebuild anything because it is under sea level. The flood we had after Hurricane Katrina was the first one of its magnitude in many decades. Our situation is no more dangerous than a city sitting on a huge fault that can slip at any time without warning.


13 posted on 12/12/2009 9:17:25 AM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: murron
Actually the whole concept of Downtowns is debatable. A less costly facility could be built outside of the flood zone, and serve the patients better. For starters the land is cheaper to build on, second it would be easier for patients to park their cars.
14 posted on 12/12/2009 9:31:17 AM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar. ---- "OBAMA: THE GREAT MISTAKE OF 2008")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

“Actually the whole concept of Downtowns is debatable. A less costly facility could be built outside of the flood zone, and serve the patients better. For starters the land is cheaper to build on, second it would be easier for patients to park their cars.”

It is being built here because of the Interstate System, the proximity to LSU Health Sciences Center and the Tulane Medical Center which provide the docs. It has plenty of parking and is being built above potential flood waters. It thankfully doesn’t have to be earthquake proof but probably is with the Feds concern about terrorism.


15 posted on 12/12/2009 10:16:07 AM PST by A Strict Constructionist (How long before we are forced to refresh the Tree of Liberty? Sic semper tryannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: murron

Baton Rouge is nearby. Far better to put it there - or 1/2 way between - than back in the bowl.

Then when a storm comes, they will not have to evacuate the hospital.


16 posted on 12/12/2009 6:13:54 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist

>>>>>
It is being built here because of the Interstate System, the proximity to LSU Health Sciences Center and the Tulane Medical Center which provide the docs. It has plenty of parking and is being built above potential flood waters. It thankfully doesn’t have to be earthquake proof but probably is with the Feds concern about terrorism. <<<<<

The interstate runs east and west. East was taken out by the Katrina. So WEST is better.

30 miles away is still in the proximity to LSU Health and Sciences Center and Tulane Medical Center. There would be even more parking further out.

No, it is not being built above flood waters.


17 posted on 12/12/2009 6:16:31 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I’ve seen plans have you.


18 posted on 12/13/2009 12:05:10 PM PST by A Strict Constructionist (How long before we are forced to refresh the Tree of Liberty? Sic semper tryannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman

Why don’t they just bulldoze the old one and rebuild it there? I went to the old one pre-Katrina, and it was horribly outdated. It needed to be torn down and rebuilt.


19 posted on 12/14/2009 11:00:57 AM PST by Melpomene (Proud member of the Who Dat nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson