I think there is actually a significant problem with the generic European/ American visual depiction of Christ -- almost to the point that it can distort interpretation of Christ's personality.
Christ is almost uniformly pictured as a thin, meek, soft-spoken, pale, flowing-haired, gown-wearing hippy. If images are to be believed, He was perpetually solemn, silent, contemplative, gentile, and always cuddling with lambs and children.
This is a man that convinced people, by sound and sight alone, that He is the Son of God. He was a carpenter (in a time before power tools), and must've had a booming voice to command such respect. He was gentile when called for -- but this was not a meek person, and not the type of guy you'd have to check for an Adam's apple to verify His gender. He didn't look like one of the BeeGees.
Christ was a man. He was a carpenter ... so probably a man of substantial size and physical strength. His hands were likely rough. His voice must've been commanding, otherwise no one would've taken Him seriously. He was of middle-eastern heritage ... so likely not pale-skinned, and likely not with brown, flowing hair. He likely had facial hair -- but not the BeeGee looking getup that's often shown.
If I had to pick a modern person that I though looked like Christ likely looked -- I think Gerard Butler (of 300 fame) has the look down pretty well ...
SnakeDoc
Hey, I did not give you permission to post photos of my husband!
I dont mean to be argumentative but.....this guy is a Jew. Ive had dinner with him....he’s not black, he’s not at all dark skinned... his family is just as fair skinned as him. Whats your point?
You make an excellent point about the man, Son of God, Jesus, who was born a Jew.
It makes me wonder, when did this “femininization” of Jesus start? Does this correlate to the femininization of western culture?
It makes me wonder if a more honest portrayal of the Son of God could reinvigorate the church.
Wimps never inspire.
That dude looks pretty much like what I’d call “white”.