Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CutePuppy

I thought we sunk about $400 bil into that. So we are going to get $400+ bil ‘back? Sounds like a load of horse-hockey. Not to mention, the $$ will go to pols in DC. Not ‘us’ folks who ponied up the cash. The will spend it on .......crap.


11 posted on 12/15/2009 3:56:11 AM PST by jbp1 (be nice now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jbp1
I thought we sunk about $400 bil into that.

Not quite that much. Geithner: TARP to Earn Healthy Profit for US - Reuters, 2009 December 14

"This month alone" is, of course, because the Treasury / FDIC / WH finally allowed banks to repay TARP, which many larger banks were trying to do for some time, but required to increase their capital reserves. Most of the hole in TARP lies in AIG (while Citi itself has not recovered, its TARP repayment is more than in full), partly because government managers rushed to sell some valuable assets, and non-financial entities such as GM and Chrysler. Fed actually made money for its backstop on the sale of Lehman Brothers, most of it to UK's Barclays.

Not to mention, the $$ will go to pols in DC. Not ‘us’ folks who ponied up the cash. They will spend it on .......crap.

Correct, see post #16. Here's how Treasury spokesman sees the money to be used, in the rest of the TARP repayment statement :

Not much more needs to be said, but of note, President Bush was the first one to misuse TARP fund when he decided to "lend" from it to "save" automakers and their unions.
18 posted on 12/15/2009 10:29:28 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson