Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
If they sent the email to Grard's personal email and he responded from his personal email, the firing violates the 1st Amendment and he can sue.

Sorry, you're wrong. Private political opinions are protected from government retaliation, not from employer retaliation.

Pseudonyms are our friends. I hate to think how many jobs I won't be qualified for just because I've voiced controversial opinions under my real name.

Of course, if employers think defending marriage is controversial, perhaps they don't deserve my labor anyway.

16 posted on 12/16/2009 11:25:21 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://twitter.com/kevinjjones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Dumb_Ox
Private political opinions are protected from government retaliation, not from employer retaliation.

That's a good point. I guess it depends on what the state laws are, and what the employer claims the cause of the dismissal is. If the laws say that the employer has to show just cause, and the cause is that the employer looked at the employee's private communications, the employee might have a lawsuit. If the employer claimed that he dismissed him for some other cause, that's different.

17 posted on 12/16/2009 12:17:18 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Who was he talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson