Skip to comments.
Lawrence Solomon: Wikipedia’s climate doctor-Wikipedia’s green doctor rewrote 5,428 climate articles
Financial Post (Canada) ^
| December 19, 2009
| Lawrence Solomon
Posted on 12/19/2009 5:17:11 PM PST by theBuckwheat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: penelopesire
This is the IDIOT who has redefined Life As We Know It on Wikipedia-??!!?? LOL (I shoulda known.)
21
posted on
12/19/2009 6:01:18 PM PST
by
PaleoBob
To: myknowledge
Here’s a quote I found from Jimmy Wales about Connolley:
“It takes a long time to deal with troublemakers,” admits Jimmy Wales, the encyclopaedia’s co-founder. “Connolley has done such amazing work and has had to deal with a fair amount of nonsense.”
To: Traveler59
this is tantamount to academic fraud This is academic fraud.
To: PaleoBob
LOL...that teddy bear looks like it has been waterboarded and tortured to me.
24
posted on
12/19/2009 6:08:12 PM PST
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: theBuckwheat
When you go to Wikipedia now, they have a splash begging for money.
Those pukes lost all credibility a while ago. This is just the nail in the coffin. Hope they go belly-up.
25
posted on
12/19/2009 6:09:57 PM PST
by
piytar
(Go Away RNC, Steele, Graham, and the rest of the lib-loser GOP. WE'RE TAKING OUR PARTY BACK!)
To: theBuckwheat
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."
-- 1984 by George Orwell. Why else do you think that the socialists are so entwined within the Western Civilization Education Systems?
26
posted on
12/19/2009 6:21:58 PM PST
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! Â)
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Also some dandruff shampoo. RTR!
27
posted on
12/19/2009 6:26:52 PM PST
by
Leo58
(Those who cheer you today will curse you tomorrow, the only thing that endures is character.)
To: theBuckwheat
Bump.
Thanks for posting this.
28
posted on
12/19/2009 6:39:12 PM PST
by
Lorianne
To: theBuckwheat
Bump.
Thanks for posting this.
29
posted on
12/19/2009 6:39:18 PM PST
by
Lorianne
To: purplelobster
"Heres a quote I found from Jimmy Wales about Connolley: It takes a long time to deal with troublemakers, admits Jimmy Wales, the encyclopaedias co-founder. Connolley has done such amazing work and has had to deal with a fair amount of nonsense.I'd love to know who has been financing Wiki until now, because Wales is currently requesting donations to keep Wiki going, ad-free
30
posted on
12/19/2009 6:45:54 PM PST
by
Bokababe
(Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: Fury
One reason why no college course I have taken allows Wikipedia to be cited as a Primary (?) or Secondary source.
+++++++++++++++++++
Funny...yet most colleges accept the AGW myth carte blanche, which we know is sourced about the same way as the debacle over there at Wikipedia.
31
posted on
12/19/2009 6:49:26 PM PST
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
To: theBuckwheat
The lying tentacles of liberalism are everywhere. One has to remain vigilant. I would imagine the same goes for SNOPES.
To: penelopesire
He waterboarded his teddy!
33
posted on
12/19/2009 6:55:15 PM PST
by
PaleoBob
To: PaleoBob
“He waterboarded his teddy!”
Fricken Ice Flow Freak!
34
posted on
12/19/2009 7:00:14 PM PST
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: SouthTexas
I had been warned on FR that Wikipedia couldn’t be trusted but I never dreamed it was this bad...
35
posted on
12/19/2009 7:02:49 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Some minds are like concrete Thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
To: penelopesire
I’d hold him down and shave that mop-0-pubes with a rusty spoon!
36
posted on
12/19/2009 7:03:41 PM PST
by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: tubebender; Fred Nerks; Marine_Uncle; NormsRevenge; FromLori; steelyourfaith; SunkenCiv
To: Fury; theBuckwheat
One reason why no college course I have taken allows Wikipedia to be cited as a Primary (?) or Secondary source. Wikipedia is an incredibly useful reference guide and is no more, or less, biased than any other source of information. It is up to the user to do his own fact checking. Anything free is worth what you pay for it.
38
posted on
12/19/2009 7:08:34 PM PST
by
killjoy
(Life sucks, wear a helmet.)
To: theBuckwheat
I say again: Wikipedia is gigantically useful for any sort of topic for which no controversy could possibly exist. For anything involving any sort of controversy no matter how slight, wiki is utterly worthless.
To: penelopesire
It’s incredible to think about this persons attitude to his fellow man. How incredibly stupid, and worthless he believes other men are. His self esteem must make it quite difficult to communicate without at some point a desire to knock the shit out of him.
I’ve met his sort before. No, I didn’t knock the shit out of them as I wanted to. I just left them to themselves. It seemed they were entertained.
40
posted on
12/19/2009 7:09:56 PM PST
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson