Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'll Have A Blue Dog Christmas Without You (Mark Steyn On The EuroNannyState Revolution Alert)
National Post ^ | 12/20/2009 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 12/21/2009 11:09:22 AM PST by goldstategop

Kathryn, re your Facebook friend who asks, "Can we officially retire the phrases 'blue dog' democrats and 'pro life' democrats? Because there is no such thing:"

As I wrote back in the summer, "Put not your trust in Blue Dog Democrats." It was folly to bet the Republic on the likes of Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln and other "moderates" who are, by definition, trimmers and accommodationists.

By contrast, Barney Frank and the more ambitious Dems are thinking long-term. And, if it's a choice between getting government health care or keeping Ben Nelson, it's no contest. Not to keep quoting myself ad nauseam, but as I said to Hugh Hewitt a couple of months back:

I think the administration is willing to take the hit. In other words, to get health care, they would be willing to reduce their majority, and perhaps even lose their majority in the House and the Senate, because they know it’s a game changer. Now to sell that to individual Senators and Congressmen, you’ve got to have something up your sleeve for them... There are strange elements in play here. But they’ve factored into the whole business a potential, I think, a potential significant loss in the year 2010, in next year’s elections.

I've been saying for a year now, in NR and NRO, that the object for savvy Dems is to get this thing passed in whatever form because, once you do, there's no going back. Kim Strassel in yesterday's Journal gets it:

So why the stubborn insistence on passing health reform? Think big. The liberal wing of the party — the Barney Franks, the David Obeys — are focused beyond November 2010, to the long-term political prize. They want a health-care program that inevitably leads to a value-added tax and a permanent welfare state. Big government then becomes fact, and another Ronald Reagan becomes impossible. See Continental Europe.

Just so. And that's worth whatever hit they have to take in 2010. Every time I make the point, someone says, oh, Jim Webb this or Byron Dorgan that, or have you see Harry Reid's numbers in Nevada? Oh, please. We've just seen what happens when you make Ben Nelson your Maginot Line. The Dems are thinking strategically; the Republicans are all tactics


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: euronannystate; marksteyn; nationalrevolution; revolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
The Democrats have a strategy: a revolution to inaugurate a EuroNanny state that can't be reversed. Its very audacity guarantees its becoming a permanent fact of life. Republicans are in the position of putting their fingers in the dike. Which is futile against the statist deluge about to come.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

1 posted on 12/21/2009 11:09:26 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I sincerely hope that EVERY “blue dog” in the house is replaced in 2010. I never liked that expression anyway. I equate “blue dogs” with “RINO’s”,


2 posted on 12/21/2009 11:15:43 AM PST by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

blue dogs are frauds. POS Jim Webb is the biggest one.


3 posted on 12/21/2009 11:23:15 AM PST by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Republicans are such losers. Permanent losers.


4 posted on 12/21/2009 11:23:42 AM PST by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knews_hound

Steyn ping.


5 posted on 12/21/2009 11:27:59 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWEETSUNNYSOUTH
I sincerely hope that EVERY “blue dog” in the house is replaced in 2010.

Yes, but the point of the article is that after passing health care and other socialist programs, it no longer matters.

6 posted on 12/21/2009 11:28:25 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

“POS Jim Webb is the biggest one”.

You got that exactly right! Warner is going right along with him. God help us!


7 posted on 12/21/2009 11:28:59 AM PST by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Dems are thinking strategically; the Republicans are all tactics

Steyn gets it.

8 posted on 12/21/2009 11:29:17 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!

Agreed. Steyn’s last line says it all. These Repubs are minor leaguers. The Dems have a goal and are all about attaining it.

The Repubs are clueless and have been for a decade. Otherwise, they’d have spent the 12 years they had with a congressional majority passing laws to shore up liberty, not undermine it by porking up their districts with government entitlements.

Their only other ‘accomplishment’ was an entitlement program for seniors, which was just another tactic. Nothing strategic about it.


9 posted on 12/21/2009 11:32:09 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

“it no longer matters”

I agree that the “blue dog” term no longer applies.


10 posted on 12/21/2009 11:33:26 AM PST by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The Dems are thinking strategically; the Republicans are all tactics

And piss poor tactics at that.

It was plain that in order to get this instituted the
dem/coms were willing to spend time in the political
wilderness only because their shining goal was that
much closer to reality.
As they told us time and again, they’ve been trying
to get this in place since FDR or before and we know
that the Soc/coms were infiltrating our government
even then and to an extent hardly realized even today.

Once you hit the tree, as much as you might want to
play it over, there’s no ignoring your bloody nose,
and the tree is still there.


11 posted on 12/21/2009 11:36:13 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
There's no conservatism in the Republican Party. The GOP spent the past decade entrenching and expanding the welfare state. They even added a new Medicare entitlement. So its hypocritical to hear them complain about the trillion dollar cost of Obamacare. A more pertinent question might be "where were they when they could have downsized government but didn't?" Its all water under the bridge now.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

12 posted on 12/21/2009 11:36:26 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
A more pertinent question might be "where were they when they could have downsized government but didn't?"

Getting $6,300.00 a month 'office allowances' paid to them AFTER THEY LEAVE OFFICE a la Hastert, that's where.

Its all water under the bridge now.

Yea, but there's a tsunami headed for that bridge.

13 posted on 12/21/2009 11:39:29 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
So why the stubborn insistence on passing health reform? Think big. The liberal wing of the party — the Barney Franks, the David Obeys — are focused beyond November 2010, to the long-term political prize. They want a health-care program that inevitably leads to a value-added tax and a permanent welfare state. Big government then becomes fact, and another Ronald Reagan becomes impossible. See Continental Europe.

They also know there are enough acorns that any loss will only be temporary.

14 posted on 12/21/2009 11:53:55 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

You said it all. The Republicans had 12 years to reduce the size of government. Name one significant program they cut? This tells me that they never intended to cut anything.


15 posted on 12/21/2009 11:54:43 AM PST by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!

Funny how I was just thinking about the George Wallace quote. “There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between these two parties”.


16 posted on 12/21/2009 12:07:26 PM PST by Hardastarboard (Maureen Dowd is right. I DON'T like our President's color. He's a Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

There isn’t any difference between the two parties. They all work for the bankers. The larger the government grows, they more bonds they have to sell, the more money they make. The only way to reduce the size of government is to get rid of the Federal Reserve. It is no coincidence that the income tax and Federal Reserve act were signed into law the same year. You could not have a large federal government without a Federal Reserve.


17 posted on 12/21/2009 12:18:39 PM PST by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

“There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between these two parties”.

And a dime doesn’t buy what it used to!


18 posted on 12/21/2009 12:20:33 PM PST by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tet68

It’s simply time to change the rules. This concession to assured 2010 losses and promises for slush fund payments coupled with Pelosi’s ‘go to jail’ clause is their preemptive blow-back tactics. People are continually asking, ‘what can we do?’ and within the ‘laws’ the leftists are enacting, they know more than most the answer is ‘not much.’ But they can’t stop a tax revolt, they can’t stop us from simply saying NO, and they can’t stop what is bound to happen.. the creation of a completely ‘black market’ society. The Signers of our Declaration of Independence became enemies of the King. They knew by signing on the hounding would start but principle and their courage prevailed. This is what the communists can not account for. How this takes shape is dependent on freedom loving G-d fearing American innovation and that is the most powerful force in the world.


19 posted on 12/21/2009 12:51:05 PM PST by Track9 (I'd rather be ruled by the first 100 names in the phonebook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
A pertinent article from Chuck Baldwin. We need to focus on our states and forget the criminals in DC. Sorry don't know how to link it.

www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20091218.html

20 posted on 12/21/2009 3:01:39 PM PST by thirst4truth (www.Believer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson