Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425
white house ^ | December 16, 2009 | BARACK OBAMA

Posted on 12/21/2009 5:38:09 PM PST by remaxagnt

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words "except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act" and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; blackmail; executiveorder; executiveorder12425; extortion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2009 5:38:09 PM PST by remaxagnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

do you realise what this is folks???????? i can not believe this is happening!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


2 posted on 12/21/2009 5:38:55 PM PST by remaxagnt (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES


3 posted on 12/21/2009 5:39:46 PM PST by remaxagnt (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

For those not up on our executive orders, what does this mean?


4 posted on 12/21/2009 5:39:55 PM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

im still in awe what could we possibly have to gain from this. dont we have the best police, cia and fbi and now he wants interpol to come and be able to circumvent our laws????????? wtf


5 posted on 12/21/2009 5:41:52 PM PST by remaxagnt (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
See here

It's a previous thread on it with some additional thoughts and info.

6 posted on 12/21/2009 5:43:51 PM PST by FourPeas (Why does Professor Presbury's wolfhound, Roy, endeavour to bite him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

Can someone smarter than me break this down? What exactly is he saying? That Interpol cannot investigate him?


7 posted on 12/21/2009 5:45:13 PM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

Thanks!


8 posted on 12/21/2009 5:46:19 PM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

no i think it means he just gave interpol the power to do what they want and they interpol have 100% immunity from everyone. so basically he can have interpol his dirty work and no one can investigate them no matter what


9 posted on 12/21/2009 6:01:49 PM PST by remaxagnt (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

First of all, welcome to FR.

Next, may I suggest that you try and be a bit less cryptic in your posts?? try to keep in mind that 99% of the rest of us do not share your unique blinding insight into the subject of your post.

If you care to generate discussion, perhaps a translation is in order.

Cheers!

BC


10 posted on 12/21/2009 6:04:01 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

I’m not attorney so this is just my best guess till someone who reads legalese comes along.

I don’t think it gives INTERPOL more power but I think it restricts domestic police from interfering which in a sense gives INTERPOL more power.


11 posted on 12/21/2009 6:06:46 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Based on Hussein Obama’s Executive Order amending EO 12425,
immediately below in the order, brackets show the language that is removed from the order

Executive Order 12425
Ronald Reagan’s Executive Orders
Executive Order 12425
by Ronald Reagan
International Criminal Police Organizations
Delivered on 16 June 1983.
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act[; except those provided by Section 2(c)], the portions of Section 2(d) [and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes], Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act]. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.
RONALD REAGAN
The White House,
June 16,1983.

Below is how the EO 12425 reads after the language is removed.

Executive Order 12425
Ronald Reagan’s Executive Orders
Executive Order 12425
by Ronald Reagan
International Criminal Police Organizations
Delivered on 16 June 1983.
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act, the portions of Section 2(d), This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.
RONALD REAGAN
The White House,
June 16,1983.

12 posted on 12/21/2009 6:20:23 PM PST by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

A pertinent link:
U.S. National Central Bureau (USNCB), a component of the U.S. Department of Justice, serves as the United States’ representative to INTERPOL
http://www.justice.gov/usncb/


13 posted on 12/21/2009 6:23:57 PM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt
You might be interested in the earlier messagethread discussions already posted:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=12425

14 posted on 12/21/2009 6:28:56 PM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

Does this mean they are now eligable for free medicare?


15 posted on 12/21/2009 6:43:46 PM PST by UpToHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I think you are right. Does the Bill of Rights apply to Interpol, the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizure?

This looks like a mess which is waiting to happen.


16 posted on 12/21/2009 7:08:42 PM PST by Candor7 ((The effective weapons Against Fascism are ridicule, derision , truth (.Member NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Maybe they have the goods on Obama.


17 posted on 12/21/2009 7:12:02 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

Fast track.......will US soldiers fire on American citizens? He needs a fighting force to control civil unrest when he institutes marshal law? There’s something despicable about this and it stinks like rotten meat! They will not go quietly.


18 posted on 12/21/2009 7:24:14 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Leaders who refuse to lead will be lead by the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


19 posted on 12/21/2009 8:22:01 PM PST by berdie (Hey, Bill Mahr...That's Mrs. Cracker to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: remaxagnt

do you realise what this is folks???????? i can not believe this is happening!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When did they tear up the Constitution? Last January? We have no representation. They do NOT listen; or they do not CARE. We have 2 choices: Enslavement, or insurrection.


20 posted on 12/21/2009 8:39:57 PM PST by molybdenum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson