Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
When a business accused of fraud begins shredding its memos and deleting its e-mails, the media are quick to proclaim these actions as signs of guilt. But, after the global warming advocates began a systematic destruction of evidence, the big television networks went for days without even reporting these facts, much less commenting on them.

The so-called "Main-Stream Media" is fully complicit in this fraud. Hence their silence.

5 posted on 12/21/2009 5:46:27 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sionnsar; All
The so-called "Main-Stream Media" is fully complicit in this fraud. Hence their silence.

Absolutely! Here's an interesting article on a journalist that saw the light. Thread posted this afternoon.

CA: From Global Warming Believer To Skeptic

6 posted on 12/21/2009 5:52:27 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar; Anima Mundi; ebiskit; TenthAmendmentChampion; Obadiah; Mind-numbed Robot; A.Hun; ...
An intercepted e-mail from a professor at the Climate Research Unit in England to a professor at the University of Pennsylvania warned the latter: "Don't any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act" and urged the American professor to delete any e-mails he may have sent a colleague regarding the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

When a business accused of fraud begins shredding its memos and deleting its e-mails, the media are quick to proclaim these actions as signs of guilt. But, after the global warming advocates began a systematic destruction of evidence, the big television networks went for days without even reporting these facts, much less commenting on them.

The so-called "Main-Stream Media" is fully complicit in this fraud. Hence their silence.
In the first sentence you use the correct number (one) implied by the use of "is" rather than "are." In the second sentence you incorrectly use the plural "their" instead of the correct singular its. You really should use better grammar. ; - )

Seriously, that is not a matter of simple grammar but of intentionally induced confusion which causes us to have difficulty correctly understanding that issue. Before the Associated Press, the press were independent voices. Now that the press is associated, it is actually one voice, with the "individual" press outlets being mere fronts. And we are surprised when the journalism monolith advocates socialism, which is nothing other than the negation of individuality and the nullification of competition!


18 posted on 12/22/2009 6:28:26 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson