[crescen7]

"Other than in the first sentence the author stated something as fact that is both unproven and speculative."

Curious? What is it about the first line that you consider "unproven" or "speculative"?

Are there not emails? (actually txt files generated from emails)

Were they not "purloined" (ie. taken) from some mail archiving system?

Or perhaps are they not from "the climate research"?

[traderrob6]

Since when does the MSM consider a whistleblower or someone leaking inside info a thief?

“Purloined” is a term that should not be applied untill we find out if this data was stolen or leaked.