[LeGrande]

My reply was in response to the frequent identification of those who question the basic premise of Darwinism with Literal 6 day creationists.

I would be correct 99 out of a 100 times doing that : ) I can accept those odds.

First, a basic fact: while many intelligent design proponents believe in a Creator (which is their world-view right), not all do. Some hold that some immanent principle or law in nature could design the universe. That is: to believe in intelligent design is not necessarily to believe in a transcendent creative being.

Do you see the flaw in your logic? How can you believe in intelligent design without an intelligent designer?

If you can overcome that flaw in your logic, maybe the rest of your post might have a point.

[SeekAndFind]

I would be correct 99 out of a 100 times doing that : ) I can accept those odds.

And where did you get that figure ? Did you do a scientific Survey ?

Do you see the flaw in your logic? How can you believe in intelligent design without an intelligent designer?

That is not MY logic. I am simply quoting what other ID supporters believe in. Please do not confuse me with the people I read and quote. If you carefully read what I wrote I said --- Some hold that some immanent principle or law in nature could design the universe.

If you can overcome that flaw in your logic, maybe the rest of your post might have a point.

Your argument is with these people who hold this belief, not me. I simply quote them as I read them.