Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Revenue Plunges, Stadium Boom Deepens Municipal Woes
New York Times ^ | December 25, 2009 | Ken Belson

Posted on 12/25/2009 2:24:17 AM PST by reaganaut1

CINCINNATI — Years after a wave of construction brought publicly financed stadiums costing billions of dollars to cities across the country, taxpayers are once again being asked to reach into their pockets.

From New Jersey to Ohio to Arizona, the stadiums were sold as a key to redevelopment and as the only way to retain sports franchises. But the deals that were used to persuade taxpayers to finance their construction have in many cases backfired, the result of overly optimistic revenue assumptions and the recession.

Nowhere is the problem more acute than in Cincinnati. In 1996, voters in Hamilton County approved an increase of half of one percent in the sales tax that promised to build and maintain stadiums for the Bengals and the Reds, pay Cincinnati’s public schools and give homeowners an annual property tax rebate. The stadiums were supposed to spur development of the city’s dilapidated riverfront.

But sales tax receipts have fallen so fast in the last year that the county is now scrambling to bridge a $14 million deficit in its sales tax fund. The public schools, which deferred taking their share for years, want their money.

The teams have not volunteered to rewrite their leases. So in the coming weeks, the county plans to cut basic services, lower its legal bills and drain a bond reserve fund with no plan for paying it back.

“Anyone looking at this objectively knows it’s a train wreck,” said Dusty Rhodes, the county auditor. “I told them they were making a big mistake, but they didn’t want to hear me.”

Cincinnati is hardly alone. In Indianapolis, the Capital Improvement Board spent 2009 trying to find $32 million to run the Lucas Oil Stadium and convention center.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: cincinattibengals; cincinnati; sports; taxfundedstadiums
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: buccaneer81

I’m not saying arenas can’t be built with private money. I’m questioning whether they can be the “draw” the restores downtown areas.


21 posted on 12/26/2009 12:44:03 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LS

Depends on the city. So far, the Arena District has been a great success for downtown Columbus. 41 Blue Jackets home games, 70 Clippers games and other assorted events in the arena and the new ballpark. 15 years ago that site was the location of the old Ohio Pen; decrepit and certainly not generating any revenue, tax or otherwise.


22 posted on 12/26/2009 12:55:44 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
Can you imagine what a dump a county arena would have been? Worse than even the Schott, I'd bet. And the only thing surrounding it would have been parking lots.

Boy, do I miss Greg Lashutka.

25 posted on 12/29/2009 2:55:29 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

In my town, now they are asking for 12 million for, among other things,an artificial turf football field. I’m writing a letter to the editor asking why they don’t ask for a retractable dome, and imploring my good neighbors to maintain their excellent voting record. My town, God bless em, votes no on everything. I love it.


26 posted on 12/29/2009 3:00:57 PM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: reaganaut1

So-called “convention centers” are even worse.
Every po-dunk town want’s a “convention center” ... like who is going to have a convention there anyway.

If it is proported to be a profitable venture, then a private developer/owner would do it.

These things almost never make money ... that’s why they rook taxpayers into paying (and paying and paying) for them.

Government should not be in the business of business


28 posted on 01/02/2010 8:23:55 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

IMO, no. They destroy downtown areas.
They are too big and the parking requirements too great. Many cities’ downtowns have been destroyed by stadiums, convention centers, Olympic venues, etc.


29 posted on 01/02/2010 8:27:04 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson