Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback; encm(ss)
This movie could have been made in a way to remove it from "earth". It is wishful and misguided thinking to conclude Cameron had no additional motive in it's construction. Although he may have made a business decision to tap into environmentalism and anti imperialism in order to align with the Obama voters, I don't believe it. The egos of people like Cameron are just too damn big for them to avoid thinking they are influencing their viewers.

One of my sons saw Avatar yesterday. His friends wanted to see it and he thought it would at least be a good sci fi story. He is able to suspend disbelief and get into a movie. He said, "it sucked", and that the reason is the bombardment of the movie’s message.

I contend:
1) Cameron deliberately made this film a propaganda vehicle.
2) His doing so screws up the movie.
3) People are receiving the anti American message he is pushing.

To be fair, I have not seen this movie. I prefer to avoid supporting such efforts with my money. I am basing this on the reviews I have read, both positive and negative, and the comments of those who have seen it.

As Mr. Silverback has pointed out, media can be used to move sentiments toward good goals or bad. Uncle Tom's Cabin is an excellent example of what could be left handedly described as "good propaganda". The same can be said for the obvious pro war movies and news reels from the 40s.

Our children are bombarded with anti western and anti American messages in all forms of media and in school. In my opinion, breaking apart this assault to individual items in order to say it is no big deal is intentionally ignorant and dangerous.

If anyone wants to see a completely enjoyable and very well done "message" movie go rent Wall-E.

105 posted on 12/30/2009 5:23:16 AM PST by 70times7 (Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: IggyDad; Mr. Silverback; encm(ss); PSYCHO-FREEP
My bad!

I missed pinging you (IggyDad) in my post 105 - and the reply was primarily for you. The two most applicable sentences are:

It is wishful and misguided thinking to conclude Cameron had no additional motive in it's construction.

and

In my opinion, breaking apart this assault to individual items in order to say it is no big deal is intentionally ignorant and dangerous.

110 posted on 12/30/2009 6:14:03 AM PST by 70times7 (Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: 70times7

Well put.


113 posted on 12/30/2009 8:28:01 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson