Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Netherlands: Airport guards cheered 9/11
De Telegraaf (Dutch) ^ | 28 December 2009 | Johan van den Dongen and Bart Olmer

Posted on 12/29/2009 7:21:00 AM PST by AIM-54

Members of one of the Dutch security companies at Schiphol Airport, Group4Securicor (G4S), are speaking out after the attempted terrorist attack on the US bound plane, for which their company was responsible.

Guards and former guards say that after the September 11 attacks, the only thing that was done was to add more workers, who knew nothing. G4S refused to comment on these accusations.

Belinda Kreugel, who until recently worked for G4S, says that she decided to speak up since the public interest is greater than her personal interest. She says that risk-flights to the US were inspected by beginners, and that people were sent out to do body searches and x-rays after just two weeks of training. Three quarters of the employees have been there for less than a year, after which it becomes too expensive to keep them. Airport administrators repeated these concerns.

One former employee says that some of the guards sympathized with Islamic terrorists. "Among my colleagues were friends of [Moroccan-Dutch terrorist] Samir Azzouz."

"I saw what happened among the guards during the September 11th attack. In the guard area of the 'security members' a loud cheer rose from Muslim colleagues. Several former colleagues witnessed it. There was a standing ovation. Together with other colleagues I've lodged a complaint about it by the military police."

English translation at: http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2009/12/netherlands-airport-guards-cheered-911.html

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraaf.nl ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: europe; islam; netherlands; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: econjack

Stopping all flights from countries who don’t take terrorism seriously and haven’t screened their own airport employees would be a good start.

IF we have to funnel all European flights thru only a few airports who are going to be vigilant is just fine with me.

The abject failure of airport security in all parts of the world seems to be a direct attempt to destroy that part of the world’s economy, also.

Another step into going back to the 7th Century?????

NObama is faaaar too much of a sympathizer to any & all things Muslim. He needs to be removed from office.

Whatever the reward for the Imposter’s birth certificate is up to now, it pales in the value of an airplane load of passengers.


21 posted on 12/29/2009 9:23:31 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AIM-54

No airport on this planet should ever hire any Muslim for any job.


22 posted on 12/29/2009 9:25:40 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

“..the US should simply deny US landing rights to any flight originating in the Netherlands.”

Ditto all nations, particularly in the Middle East, that don’t all the full body scanning. Another thread on here this morning said ME nations are objecting to the idea of full body searches. Fine, just don’t come to the US. Works for me.


23 posted on 12/29/2009 9:27:38 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Finny

And again, we see government at its efficient best. Don't bother checking the twenty-five year old male Muslim, who doesn't have a pass-port, paid cash for his ticket, no checked luggage, on a government terrorism watch list,... What's that, can't use the word terrorism?,... sorry, never mind.

24 posted on 12/29/2009 9:32:13 AM PST by Sefton (Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, Trotskism, Maoism, Obamaism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
No airport on this planet should ever hire any Muslim for any job.'

Don't fly into Minneapolis/St Paul then - it's virtually all Somalians.

Celebrate Diversity! Or is it lack of diversity? I'm confused.

25 posted on 12/29/2009 9:34:16 AM PST by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Thank you for contacting Senator Collins’ office with your inquiry regarding the Dutch policy of permitting U.S. Marshals aboard outbound flights from the Netherlands . Pursuant to your inquiry, I have looked into the matter with the Congressional Research Service (a well-respected non-partisan arm of the Library of Congress), which informs me that U.S. air marshals have never had a problem being denied access to a flight that they have requested to board.
Again, thank you contacting the senator’s office. If we can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Cheers,

Chris MacDonald
Office of U.S. Senator Susan M. Collins
One Canal Plaza Ste. 802 | Portland , ME 04101
Ph: 207.780.3575 | Fax: 207.828.0380
chris_macdonald@collins.senate.gov | www.collins.senate.gov


26 posted on 12/29/2009 9:36:37 AM PST by maine yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sefton
Thank you for posting that pic. The American flag in the background, I assume, indicates that this is at an American airport.

As long as Muslims are allowed to be screeners at American airports, passengers and crew on American flights are as in as much danger as the soldiers killed in the massacre at Fort Hood.

27 posted on 12/29/2009 9:39:20 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

>> “I saw what happened among the guards during the September 11th attack. In the guard area of the ‘security members’ a loud cheer rose from Muslim colleagues.”

This report doesn’t surprise me. I’m sure there are reports of similar activity in the States.

That said, gate security was operated by Western looking individuals on my flights back to the U.S. They always appeared to take their jobs seriously.

Regardless of the allegations about the guards, it would make sense to think about who has access to the facilities that provide security lists.


28 posted on 12/29/2009 9:43:10 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM-54
Muslims should be banned from working anywhere within a thousand miles of any public or private airport. Think about it.
29 posted on 12/29/2009 10:45:21 AM PST by PoloSec (Paul: 2Tim2:7 Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM-54

Muzzie security guards. Nice.


30 posted on 12/29/2009 11:30:30 AM PST by Overtaxed Patriot (Lock and load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Photobucket
31 posted on 12/29/2009 12:12:31 PM PST by erman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: erman
That picture and its caption ... dangerous absurdity.

I can only wish it was as benignly humorous as a photo I saw not too long ago of a guy with his baseball hat on backward ... using his hand to shade his eyes, while others sitting right next to him had their eyes shaded by the bills of the baseball caps they were wearing properly.

The sad, sick, disgusting poster of the scarved Muslim screener searching the middle-aged nun is the picture-postcard illustration of dangerous absurdity in America.

Security screening at airports is a waste of our time, a charade, and a sham as long as Muslims are in on the searching. It is all a big game of pretend as long as they are there.

32 posted on 12/29/2009 1:36:12 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: erman; Sefton

Do either of you know — was that photo taken at an American airport? If so, then it’s an outrage because OUR TAX DOLLARS are paying for this silly fool’s game. If it was taken at the airport of another country, that’s another ballgame.


33 posted on 12/29/2009 1:40:31 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Sorry, for the misunderstanding.

They may still be there. I don’t know. I haven’t used the airport in over a year.


34 posted on 12/29/2009 2:20:56 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: erman; Finny
I had a long argument with some libs and a Republican McCain lover over that pic.
They insisted Nuns are just as dangerous as Imams.
Most libs believe Islam is peaceful and only those that distort Islam are the dangerous ones. Given them statics to prove other wise and lots of other evidence they still believe that.


But in the end had to agree with them the Nuns need to be checked as well. for two reasons:
1. Someone could slip them something they were not aware of.
2. Anyone can get a Nuns outfit.

35 posted on 12/29/2009 3:04:33 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Anyone can get a Nuns outfit.

you are correct...

I was wondering however..... exactly how many "fake nuns" have blown up jets, flown jets into buildings, opened fire at army bases, fragged out fellow soldiers, taken over ocean liners and rolled passengers off the deck, hidden in the back of a car while being driven around and murdered innocent people as a sniper, driven trucks into Marine bases and detonated them....?

That many huh?

Well in that case by all means we should cavity search every woman, especially blond nordic women because that will yield us the highest number of terrorists. I would avoid black men, brown skinned men with mustaches that speak with heavy mid-easter accents, eastern european men that are muslims, and especially anybody that buys a ticket with cash, one way, with no passport and no luggage.

36 posted on 12/29/2009 4:01:01 PM PST by erman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: erman

i am not disagreeing with you.


37 posted on 12/29/2009 4:02:55 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Don't know where it was taken but there's the American Flag on the wall. I sure am glad that nun was searched though, they have that reputation of terrorizing students with rulers. Oh, yeah, those old nuns are usually pro-life so Janet has called them home grown extremists.

Don't worry about searching the Muslim fanatic that even had his father freaked out. I don't know why everyone wants to get on board with the nudi-x-ray machines when there's no proof that it would even work on sponge bob square pants underwear bombs.

WHAT WE NEED IS A HEALTHY DOSE OF PROFILING!

Better yet, crotch sniffing, bomb smelling dogs. No...even better, bomb smelling pigs! Political correctness should not trump national security!

38 posted on 12/29/2009 4:25:26 PM PST by Sefton (Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, Trotskism, Maoism, Obamaism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
"Anyone can get a Nuns outfit"

So Steve, you have 10,000 passengers trying to get through an airport on a busy holiday, have one newfangled nudi-x-ray machines. You have a 72 year old women dressed in a habit (with no five o'clock shadow or Koran under her arm,) and a 25 year old male who is sweating bullets, (and has no luggage, and a one way ticket.) You only have time to check one, which who do you scan?

Profiling is reasonable in a time of war. Anyone inconvenienced by it who fusses isn't pulling for the right side! If Muslims get pissed, let them clean up their own and stop the jihadists. The bombers father tried to. I bet he would have wanted his son profiled!

39 posted on 12/29/2009 4:45:27 PM PST by Sefton (Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, Trotskism, Maoism, Obamaism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson