Posted on 01/01/2010 6:04:21 AM PST by mikelets456
I have obtained a copy of Bloombergs secret Blueprint for Federal Action on Guns which is really a blueprint for how the Obama Administration can screw gun owners without needing anything from Congress. Chuck Michel is responsible for filing to FOIA request to get this one out and public where it belongs, [UPDATE: If you want to get the exclusive on this kind of stuff, I would suggest heading over to calgunlaws.com and registering. Their law firm does a lot of cutting edge Second Amendment legal work. It's a great resource.] This was the infamous 40 recommendations that the Washington Post reported on a few months ago. It this document doesnt convince you that MAIG is a significantly more serious threat than any other gun control organization out there, nothing will. Whoever wrote this knows ATF very well, and understands federal gun laws well enough to know how to effectively make changes using only administrative and regulatory changes, which do not require action from the US Congress. While some of the 40 recommendations are not objectionable, quite a number of them are. Let me go down the list and pick out some of the worst offenders, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. Look at the document yourself to find others:
(Excerpt) Read more at snowflakesinhell.com ...
Liberals never stop, regardless of facts.
They intend to eliminate the private ownership of firearms and will do anything that furthers that agenda, even incrementally.
Liberals always lie, because they know that people will recoil from their true agenda. They *know* they are smarter than everyone else, and the world would be so much better if they could just tell everyone what to do.
Fortunately, most of what they *know* is false.
Obama applauds citizens for foiling the Underwear Bomber then continues his bid to disarm the populace.
If we’re the last line of defense, why are we being disarmed?
>Obama applauds citizens for foiling the Underwear Bomber then continues his bid to disarm the populace.
If were the last line of defense, why are we being disarmed?<
I made the statement before and i want to make it again in response to your rhetorical question. Tell me if you think I am on the money or way off the mark please.
Obama’s administration living on the principle of never allowing a good crisis go to waste has a plan.
Letting attacks on the general population like the christmas flight is great for Obama .. No one was hurt, so he can’t really take a lot of heat. He can claim that something went wrong and there needs to be a lot of changes.
These changes will necessitate his disarming the public for our general safety since we don’t want guns falling into the wrong hands.
But to make sure that the public is safe, he will now press forward with his “civilian security force” ..
Probably after he works on making 20 million people citizens who are pretty much at his beck and call because they want to be in this country legally and receive every benefit that they can FREE!
Where will he get his civilian security force from you may wonder.
20 million Mexicans who have no allegiance to the people of this country that is where! ACORN and his other “community organizations”
Now Obama has the citizenry “protected” by his new security force.
Reality check:
1. Disarm American citizens
2. Train people who don’t give a darn about us in para-military operations.
3. Turn them lose on political dissidents
Am I over the top?
1. Disarm American citizens
2. Train people who dont give a darn about us in para-military operations.
3. Turn them lose on political dissidents
Am I over the top?
************
No, FRiend, you're not "over the top" by any means. You've just outlined one of the many ways that tyranny and horror could be inflicted on us.
It is incumbent upon We The People to defend our Constitution (they sure as hell won't!) and not allow this crap to proceed. They will try ... we will resist ... they will try again ...
As Jim Robinson so often says, "Keep your powder dry."
Very bad days lie ahead ...
Agreed, he will most likely try to get his “civilian security force” in place with his people. He will also try to disarm average citizens. However, he greatly underestimates the people of this country. Congress is in for a big shake-up in ‘10. We may not be able to over-ride vetoes, but we will control the budget. Hopefully this country won’t be too far down the toilet by that time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.