Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mayor's Against Illegal Guns Gun Control Blueprint
Snowflakesinhell ^ | 12/28/2009 | sebastian

Posted on 01/01/2010 6:04:21 AM PST by mikelets456

I have obtained a copy of Bloomberg’s secret “Blueprint for Federal Action on Guns” which is really a blueprint for how the Obama Administration can screw gun owners without needing anything from Congress. Chuck Michel is responsible for filing to FOIA request to get this one out and public where it belongs, [UPDATE: If you want to get the exclusive on this kind of stuff, I would suggest heading over to calgunlaws.com and registering. Their law firm does a lot of cutting edge Second Amendment legal work. It's a great resource.] This was the infamous 40 recommendations that the Washington Post reported on a few months ago. It this document doesn’t convince you that MAIG is a significantly more serious threat than any other gun control organization out there, nothing will. Whoever wrote this knows ATF very well, and understands federal gun laws well enough to know how to effectively make changes using only administrative and regulatory changes, which do not require action from the US Congress. While some of the 40 recommendations are not objectionable, quite a number of them are. Let me go down the list and pick out some of the worst offenders, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. Look at the document yourself to find others:

(Excerpt) Read more at snowflakesinhell.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloomberg; constitution; corruption; guns
* Require REAL ID compliant identification for all gun purchasers. Those in non-complying states, which are many, will no longer be permitted to buy firearms. * Recommends a ban on the importation of all “non-sporting” firearms and ammunition, and specifically calls for banning the FN Five-Seven. Kiss cheap imported rounds of military caliber goodbye. Maybe kiss Glock’s goodbye too. MAIG isn’t all that specific on what would be sporting or non sporting. Also note that MAIG can no longer claim they do not advocate banning guns. They do. * Calls for keeping records for people who get a NICS default proceed, which means your background check has not “cleared” but you went through the required three day waiting period. These records can be kept for up to 20 years, in the case of someone who’s name matches someone on the “terror watch” list and six months ordinarily. Default proceeds can happen if NICS has incomplete records, or the system is down for a protracted period of time. * Calls for more enforcement of gun shows using the Richmond model. The techniques used at the Richmond gun shows were bad enough that Congress held hearings about the methods, and demanding ATF put a stop to them. They act
1 posted on 01/01/2010 6:04:22 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Liberals never stop, regardless of facts.

They intend to eliminate the private ownership of firearms and will do anything that furthers that agenda, even incrementally.


2 posted on 01/01/2010 6:36:27 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Liberals always lie, because they know that people will recoil from their true agenda. They *know* they are smarter than everyone else, and the world would be so much better if they could just tell everyone what to do.

Fortunately, most of what they *know* is false.


3 posted on 01/01/2010 6:52:27 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456


I take it these ass clowns have never heard of the law of unintended consequences.
4 posted on 01/01/2010 7:56:56 AM PST by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Obama applauds citizens for foiling the Underwear Bomber then continues his bid to disarm the populace.

If we’re the last line of defense, why are we being disarmed?


5 posted on 01/01/2010 8:22:52 AM PST by DNME (Remember, we are still under a state of national emergency for H1N1! Remain vigilant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DNME

>Obama applauds citizens for foiling the Underwear Bomber then continues his bid to disarm the populace.

If we’re the last line of defense, why are we being disarmed?<

I made the statement before and i want to make it again in response to your rhetorical question. Tell me if you think I am on the money or way off the mark please.

Obama’s administration living on the principle of never allowing a good crisis go to waste has a plan.

Letting attacks on the general population like the christmas flight is great for Obama .. No one was hurt, so he can’t really take a lot of heat. He can claim that something went wrong and there needs to be a lot of changes.

These changes will necessitate his disarming the public for our general safety since we don’t want guns falling into the wrong hands.

But to make sure that the public is safe, he will now press forward with his “civilian security force” ..
Probably after he works on making 20 million people citizens who are pretty much at his beck and call because they want to be in this country legally and receive every benefit that they can FREE!

Where will he get his civilian security force from you may wonder.

20 million Mexicans who have no allegiance to the people of this country that is where! ACORN and his other “community organizations”

Now Obama has the citizenry “protected” by his new security force.

Reality check:
1. Disarm American citizens
2. Train people who don’t give a darn about us in para-military operations.
3. Turn them lose on political dissidents

Am I over the top?


6 posted on 01/01/2010 10:47:13 AM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Munz
Reality check:

1. Disarm American citizens
2. Train people who don’t give a darn about us in para-military operations.
3. Turn them lose on political dissidents

Am I over the top?

************

No, FRiend, you're not "over the top" by any means. You've just outlined one of the many ways that tyranny and horror could be inflicted on us.

It is incumbent upon We The People to defend our Constitution (they sure as hell won't!) and not allow this crap to proceed. They will try ... we will resist ... they will try again ...

As Jim Robinson so often says, "Keep your powder dry."

Very bad days lie ahead ...

7 posted on 01/01/2010 1:07:15 PM PST by DNME (Remember, we are still under a state of national emergency for H1N1! Remain vigilant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DNME

Agreed, he will most likely try to get his “civilian security force” in place with his people. He will also try to disarm average citizens. However, he greatly underestimates the people of this country. Congress is in for a big shake-up in ‘10. We may not be able to over-ride vetoes, but we will control the budget. Hopefully this country won’t be too far down the toilet by that time.


8 posted on 01/01/2010 2:21:57 PM PST by TStro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson