Posted on 01/03/2010 5:58:33 AM PST by decimon
WASHINGTON (AFP) Irish rock star Bono called Sunday for tougher controls over the spread of intellectual property over the Internet, arguing that file swiping and sharing hurt creators of cultural products.
>
"A decade?s worth of music file-sharing and swiping has made clear that the people it hurts are the creators -- in this case, the young, fledgling songwriters who can?t live off ticket and T-shirt sales like the least sympathetic among us," Bono noted.
The singer pointed out that the US effort to stop child pornography and China?s effort to suppress online dissent indicate that it is "perfectly possible to track" Internet content.
>
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Take this Bono. Copyright laws ought to be treated like patents. You get a set time to make your millions, and after that they cease protection. Copyright protection is so skewed now they gets used to protect the work of composers who died 100 years ago.
Its the age of the internet Bono — all music should enter the public domain at some point.
“Who will rid us of this troublesome muse?”
Drugs? Self-Righteousness? Hubris? IRS?
“Bono should be focusing his energy on figuring out how he became such a crappy songwriter after Achtung Baby. I would happily cough up $15 for anything that comes close to The Unforgettable Fire or Joshua Tree.”
I admit - I really enjoyed “Atomic Bomb”
But it appears Bono doesn’t like his personal property confiscated?
huh - fancy that. Join the club.
Many times I've downloaded a song onto my computer only to go out and buy the entire CD because I wanted to play the music in my car or at work.
My point being is that sometimes downloading leads to MORE sales for the artist(s).
Bono just another One-World Liberal Globalist who believes that he is above everyone else...and laws should apply only to the lesser people. His support of Communist China “regulating the internet” should scare everyone.
As for young and new artists....a lot of them are breaking out now because of file sharing and downloading....its only geezers like Bono who must still subscribe to old, failed methods of media distribution.
He must be a Christian--according to the article linked in post 15 above he has his own personal priest.
Bono: “I don’t have enough money, even though I earned more than $123 million in 2009 alone”
“U2 racked up the highest-grossing North American tour of 2009, pulling in $123 million at the box office in a year in which overall concert business was one of the music industry’s remaining bright spots.”
Bono: ‘I’m overpaid, so shoot me’
Bono, the multi-millionaire rock star and frontman of U2, has admitted that he is overpaid but dismissed claims of hypocrisy for preaching about poverty in developing countries.
Earlier this year, leading charities including Oxfam attacked U2 for moving their business to the Netherlands where there is virtually no tax on royalties. It deprived Ireland of revenue and the government then cut its overseas aid budget.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/6708665/Bono-Im-overpaid-so-shoot-me.html
(Instead of prime rib, try this, Mr. Moore--affordable, given your new, tiny salary):
The irony of this is that the music industry never learns. It would rather wither and die than share any money with anyone else, for stuff most every other business regards as good for business.
Especially advertising. The music industry hates advertising, because their giving money to advertisers isn’t “fair”. They believe even advertisers should pay *them*, the music industry, for the privilege to advertise *their*, the music industry’s, music.
This isn’t just being greedy. This is stupidly greedy. Clutching greedy. Daffy Duck greedy.
The best example is Music Television. The cable TV channel is now just called MTV, because it rarely if ever plays music videos any more. From 1980 to about 2000, it was the greatest music advertisement business ever created. It introduced America and other countries to hundreds of new artists, and caused explosive sales in the music industry.
If you poll people even today about their favorite music artists, the public remembers dozens of the MTV artists of the ‘80s and ‘90s. But after then, for the last decade, maybe only one or two.
So what happened? Simple. The music industry couldn’t stand that MTV was making money by showing music videos, and not paying the music industry millions of dollars, virtually everything MTV earned, to do so.
It didn’t matter that it made the music industry a fortune. They just couldn’t abide that *anyone* else also made money off of “their” music. They felt that it was like “stealing” from them.
And so we no longer have Music Television. It is no longer an influential cultural and artistic phenomenon. It no longer creates superstars and inspires a whole new generation of artists. Instead we have reverted to what existed before MTV.
And the music industry is even trying to destroy that. It is now trying to demand huge royalties even for radio stations to broadcast “their”, the music industry’s, music.
This isn’t just being greedy. This is stupidly greedy. Clutching greedy. Daffy Duck greedy.
On top of all this, there is file sharing. It is about the only way people are being introduced to new music today. This is because they can actually listen to it before they buy it.
Is it any wonder that the music industry hates it with a burning passion?
And in their arrogance and greed, they put a priority of outlawing sharing of music made by non-music industry artists. This is because, on top of everything else, the music industry wants a complete monopoly over *all* music. No music of any kind, for anyone, unless they give us, the music industry, money.
The sooner this industry dies, the better. Then maybe artists can make and sell music, and their audience, and potential audience, can enjoy it.
I’m surprised that people are interested in talking to me any more. They must just think, God, he’s back again- Bono
LOL....understatement of the year.
Why doesn't he just go fly around in his 4-engine jet and rip a few more holes in the ozone layer.
The oil he burns to air-condition this palace could pay for the food and medicine for a small African country.
But this is only one of his beachfront palaces... I couldn't find the other one with all the environment destroying SUVs parked out front.
I'm sure that just cutting the grass on his other hangar of a home rips a major rent into the ozone. Oh, then theres his ozone shredding private jet...
Boner should just shut up and sing.
He's a crooner for teenage girls, not an Economist. Not the Dalai Lama nor anyone's prophet.
But... it can't be true, it's yet another one of Boner's homes?
Yikes! Another energy guzzling property owned by Boner.
How do you say, "Fill 'er up" in Gaelic?
If you would listen to a typical leftist like Boner, he might tell you to drive a hybrid. It's the perfect solution for you and me.
But how do Boner and his friends get around?
They call it, "Elevation Air".
"Look, up in the sky, it's a bird... it's a plane... it's, it's... BONER Ripping a huge hole in the ozone..."
Now those previous jets were all used by U2. The first one had just two measley engines, the second one had three nice jet engines...
But now, for cruising around Europe, Boner goes alone, so can use a smaller jet, but heck, why cut back on those fuel guzzling engines. His new jet has FOUR ENGINES. That ought to open up that pesky ozone layer!
Yessireee. Those are four Avco Lycoming ALF 502R-5 engines. Each one weighs over half a ton.
This beast burns plenty of jet fuel too!
Fuel capacity: 9,300Kgs
Fuel consumption: 470Kgs / engine / hour
At a cruising speed of 400 knots, that works out to more than a kilogram of fuel for each mile traveled.
By my calculation, this beast gets about 3 miles per gallon.
50-year-old Bono and his guitar player friend however, are different. They are allowed to enjoy teenage girls.
SHUT UP AND SING!
You don’t often see Bono and intellectual in the same sentence.
Hey, Bono. They’re just socializing your music. You like socialism, don’t you?
Screw you Bono. I’ll start to get a little respect for copyright when they return it to a more reasonable 28-year term. Most of this joker’s ‘music’ should be in the public domain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.