Posted on 01/04/2010 7:28:33 PM PST by RobinMasters
The media is definitely avoiding its duty to investigate and make these matters clear, thereby protecting the nation that gives them freedom and an income.
how could he have gone to Pakistan when there was a ban on American citizens or using an American passport?
There’s just two many questions to be answered.
This guy came form no where and over night at the Dem convention he was made a hero by the media and those working with him .
Those I might add who say they have to control the media and Anita Dunn has said they have done well so far in that.
This guy 10 years ago was a no body and now he’s the president with access to all secrets and the finger on the button.
Just who the hell is he?
Even now the media won’t ask why he refuses to go to church or why did they lie before Christmas about swapping presents and then after they admit they did not swap presents and never have done.
If the media can’t ask that then they will never be asking more important questions.
What is it with the white house media, are they still star struck.
Watching them asking Gibbs is cringworthy to say the least.
Passport Services/Bureau of Consular Affa[irs]
Department of State/Wahington. D.C. 205__
AUGUST 17, 1981
TRAVEL TO PAKISTAN
BEFORE TRAVELING TO PAKISTAN, AMERICAN CITIZENS SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLO[WING]
UPDATED VISA REQUIREMENTS: 30 DAY VISAS ARE AVAILABLE AT PAKISTANI AIRPORTS [FOR]
TOURISTS ONLY. AS THESE VISAS ARE RARELY EXTENDED BEYOND THE 30 DAY TIME PER[IOD,]
TOURISTS PLANNING TO STAY LONGER SHOULD SECURE VISAS BEFORE COMING TO PAKIS[TAN.]
ANY TRAVELER COMING INTO PAKISTAN OVERLAND FROM INDIA MUST REPEAT MUST HA[VE A]
VALID VISA, AS 30 DAY VISAS ARE NOT REPEAT NOT ISSUED AT THE OVERLAND BOR[DER]
CROSSING POINT AT WAGHA.
ANY NON-OFFICIAL AMERICAN WHO IS IN PAKISTAN FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS MUST REGIS[TER]
WITH THE GOVERNMENT’S FOREIGNER REGISTRATION OFFICE. EXIT PERMITS ARE REQUI[RED]
FOR THOSE WHO HAVE STAYED LONGER THAN 30 DAYS BEFORE THEY ARE ALLOWED TO LE[AVE T]HE
COUNTRY. ALL AMERICANS TRAVELING TO PAKISTAN ON OFFICIAL BUSINESS OR [FOR]
PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A VISA BEFORE ARRIVAL, AND, AS [THE]
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN’S CLEARANCE PROCESS IS OFTEN QUITE LENGTHY, WE WOULD URGE TH[OSE]
COMING TO APPLY AT THE NEAREST PAKISTANI EMBASSY OR CONSULATE AS FAR IN ADVA[NCE]
OF THEIR SCHEDULED ARRIVAL AS POSSIBLE.
THIS SUPERSEDED REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION M-264, [”VISA]
REQUIREMENTS OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.[”]
EXPIRATION DATE: INDEFINITE.
I hadn’t heard that before; that certainly would be a problemm, if Hawaii had followed those rules.
That’s one creepy video.
Thanks justiceseeker93.
People do that with Obama and Malcolm X as well.
It's easy if the people in the photos are of a different race than the people looking at them.
But it's doubtful whether a forensic photography specialist who measured all the facial features would come to the same conclusion.
But the man fingered as Barack Sr. could be just about anybody. I don't see much resemblance.
Corsi would have done better to investigate the circumstances of the photo, rather than to give in to speculation.
Like others have said, this photo is nothing new. CBS’s 60 Minutes had this photo online at least as early as February 2007:
http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2007/02/09/60minutes/photoessay2455502_1_5_photo.shtml
CBS’s caption gives the occasion: “Obama’s father, Barack Obama Sr., center, is shown wearing floral leis on his graduation day at the University of Hawaii in the early 1960s.” The caption doesn’t say that the white man is Stanley Dunham.
I just came across this thread again, wanted to let you know I saved that image August 4, 2008.
WND ‘found it’ in January 2010?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.