Posted on 01/04/2010 7:38:03 PM PST by Man50D
Beck only aids in BO's usurpation of the Constitution. He should be ashamed of himself. Fortunately there are a growing number of citizens who have a far keener grasp of this crisis then Beck and aren't afraid to defend the Constitution.
A few months ago people were protesting against the media's blackout(specifically CNN,CBS,NBC,ABC) of what they consider pro Conservative issues. People need to take the same approach with Beck and Fox. Don't let them shirk their journalistic responsibility to investigate and report. There is nothing fair and balanced about Beck's childish rant and Fox's silence.
Oh, I thought this was going to be important, like how 0bama is (not) prosecuting the WOT but I clicked on the link and see it’s just more birther stuff.
Cindie
Oh, please. If Beck or whomever doesn’t agree with you or some other conservative on every jot and tittle, so what.
I don’t mean too sound harsh, but really.
Don't hold your breath.
P.S. If someone comes up with something that proves Beck wrong on taking the cautious approach to this issue, Beck will be the first to admit it.
I suggest you get your own radio show.
There is nothing fair and balanced about your rant that Beck’s staff refused people the opportunity to take over HIS show.
All you gotta know is that the Glen Beck Show belongs to Glen Beck and he has every right to talk about the things he wants to talk about and to control the content of HIS show.
Rant about the content of his or anyone else’s show all you want, but please understand that no one has a right, moral or otherwise, to try to force content onto someone else’s show.
Try that crap -— on whatever issue they do not want to discuss on their show -— on Rush, Hannity, Savage or Levin and you’ll get the same result.
Glen Beck, like other “conservative” talkshow hosts, has to eat. And they like to eat well.
If you don’t like Glenn Beck because he isn’t falling all over himself to cover your pet issue then stop listening to him and create your own show.
PLUS, Beck is not the enemy.
It's by far much more important to find out who tried to poison Rush Limbaugh.
If you and others are mad at Beck or don’t like the way he runs his shows don’t listen and watch. What is so hard about that? Deprive him of your numbers. This is insane.
I may get slammed for this, don’t really care, but it seems like a divide and conquer post to me. Let’s stay united shall we.
If you don’t like what Beck is doing, why don’t you just stick with Michael Savage and leave it at that?
Yaaawwwwwnnn......
What has the effort to attack BO on his eligibility produced? Name one thing please.
It seems, at this point, that defeating Democrats in Congress should be where effort is spent.
Glenn Beck will NOT cower to public opinion. He carefully and honestly RESEARCHES all points he makes.
I too was deeply disturbed by what the “birthers” were talking about. I deep inside feel Zero is not qualified to be president, constitutionally, and other wise. But, there is no actual evidence. We are a nation of laws. If there is NO EVIDENCE, then we should not insist we are right. Glenn is covering his own, and Fox’s A$$es by being responsible, and truthful. If you don’t like what he says, so what?
YR
I would certainly like Rush, Beck, and others to treat the birther issue with the seriousness that it deserves.
But this isn’t the way to do it. If you flood a call-in radio show with large numbers of people trying to attack the host, what other kind of reaction can you expect?
The idea on a call-in show is to call in with questions or comments about the topic that is being discussed. This kind of thing interrupts the host and threatens to wreck the show. Of course the screener needs to get you off the line as soon as possible. And of course they are angry.
I’m not a particular Beck fan, but wrecking his show is not the way to persuade him to your point of view. Quite the opposite.
Rush and Beck don’t need to say that Obama is a usurper. All they need to do is report on the issue, and on what a lot of people are saying. And, perhaps, ask the $64,000 question: Why won’t Obama show his birth certificate?
I think this phone-athon is the wrong way to go about persuading them. But they have a legitimate right to report on the question, if not to definitively answer it.
It really is a stunner: Obama refuses to release any of his records, including his real birth certificate. Why? Beck can’t answer that question, but there’s no reason why he shouldn’t ask why Obama refuses to answer it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.