To: Vince Ferrer
Thank God. Something which wasn’t “too big to fail”.
2 posted on
01/04/2010 8:54:52 PM PST by
TheZMan
(Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
To: Vince Ferrer
Obviously the shipping interests see no green shoots on our shores.
To: Vince Ferrer
4 posted on
01/04/2010 8:59:09 PM PST by
blam
To: Vince Ferrer
No more need for all those ships to bring cheap plastic Chinese crap across the ocean? Wonder what effect this will have on Asian economy in 2010???
5 posted on
01/04/2010 9:00:03 PM PST by
John.Galt2012
(I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
To: Vince Ferrer
Yes, but are not several new container ships due out this year with a capacity of about 15,000 TEU’s? I understand plans
have been made to construct ships with 20,000 TEU’s.
To: Vince Ferrer
I guess those huge, primitive ship-breaking yards in India and China are busy once again. Saw a video on YouTube about those places - they simply run the ships aground, then start hacking off pieces until what remains is light enough to be winched up on "dry land" for the coup de grace. Some of the most highly polluted land on the planet, those beaches. Makes the average EPA Superfund clean-up site look pristine.
I'll bet most of the eco-nazis haven't the faintest clue.
8 posted on
01/04/2010 9:04:57 PM PST by
Charles Martel
("Endeavor to persevere...")
To: Vince Ferrer
I wonder what happens to the engines from those scrapped ships?
9 posted on
01/04/2010 9:05:28 PM PST by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: Vince Ferrer
Why don’t they use them as convey escorts or decoys in pirate infested waters?
Having emitted this half-thought - this is the real indicator of Global economic health no matter what pundits say - IMHO
10 posted on
01/04/2010 9:12:26 PM PST by
J Edgar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson