[fr_freak]

The poor quality of birther reading comprehension skills never ceases to amaze me...Earth to birthers: I never claimed Stanley Annn was old enough to automatically confer US citizenship onto her newborn son if he were born in Kenya.

What possible motive would granny Toot have to risk a purjury conviction and fraudulantly register her grandson's birth in Hawaii, if there were a simple and perfectly legal means for securing his citizenship if he really were born abroad?

Wow, talk about the pot calling the kettle black. My entire post was to address precisely your point above...and you missed the whole thing. This is why I am sick and tired of debating this issue with people who can't be bothered to keep current on the issues, or read fully other people's posts. But maybe that's your objective?

[curiosity]

curiosity wrote: What possible motive would granny Toot have to risk a purjury conviction and fraudulantly register her grandson's birth in Hawaii, if there were a simple and perfectly legal means for securing his citizenship if he really were born abroad?

fr_freak wrote: My entire post was to address precisely your point above...and you missed the whole thing.

Sorry, but you did not address it in your post. In fact, you still haven't addressed.

Let me give you another chance:

"What possible motive would granny Toot have to risk a purjury conviction and fraudulantly register her grandson's birth in Hawaii, if there were a simple and perfectly legal means for securing his citizenship if he really were born abroad?"

Can you answer that question? Enquiring minds want to know!