Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spike Knotts

I understand your frustration at being forced to subsidize other people’s lifestyles, but you are going in entirely the wrong direction in your reaction. We should be tearing down the welfare state, not the right of people to reproduce as they want to. Take away this woman’s ability to get taxpayer money, not her ability to have children.


57 posted on 01/05/2010 4:47:22 PM PST by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Irish Rose

I don’t believe I’ve said one word about sterilization, forced or otherwise. I don’t believe sterilization is necessary or even desirable...and regardless, if you cut off the money, that’s one hell of an autoclave. What happens to them then is...well...their concern. See how neat and fair that is? Beautiful simplicity

I don’t believe this woman or her story. Her very lifestyle proves she is a liar and a fraud. Not to mention the following, which none of the bleeding hearts here found worth commenting on, for some reason.

“The suit against Baystate is not the first reproductive claim Savicki has filed. In 2001, Borten confirmed, Savicki won a settlement against CVS and a spermicide company after she became pregnant using expired spermicide.

Borten, who was not her lawyer in the case, said that kind of lawsuit could have garnered seven figures, but Savicki won only about $20,000 and took home a little more than $1,000. “

Yep, a hell of a gal. She only got 20,000, you see. She could have got 7 figures! So, it was a frivolous lawsuit but she was only moderately greedy. By the way, I speak lawyer to a degree...and what he really said here is that they asked for 7 figures and settled for 20 grand. That is what they call spin in the lawyer industry.

And you’re going to have a hell of a time “tearing down” the welfare state if you’re always afraid to swing a demo hammer because a child is in the way. Yeah, you’ll get around to dismantling it, but in the meantime, let them breed unlimited foot soldiers to resist your attempt to “tear down” the welfare state. That’s kind of like leaving sugar out for the roaches so that you have plenty of targets when you start stomping them in your belated attempt at pest control. Sheer genius.

Stopping funding immediately would cause the welfare state to tear itself down. No further action necessary, except perhaps riot control.

These people are vampires. They live on our life’s blood. Everything she takes from me and gives to her children is that much less that I can provide for MY children, who I LABOR for. Unlike her.

If Hitler had been smart he’d have just moved 5 million illegal Germans to some large city and waited for the creation of welfare as we know it. We could never have resisted him because...its about the children!

I care as much about her little brood of monsters as I do about the children who died screaming in Dresden. Enemy=enemy. At least Germans came at you shooting, not sideways while trying to pick your pockets under the guise of a “right.”


65 posted on 01/05/2010 5:01:20 PM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson