National Cancer Institute Researcher Admits Abortion-Breast Cancer Link True

LifeNews.com ^ | January 6, 2010 | Steven Ertelt

[chris_bdba]

From the studies I’ve read miscarriage is different in how the hormones react. In miscarriage they drop a little at a time rather than having them high running through the body with no baby to support.

[Claud]

I have read the same. In fact, I remember some research a few years ago that found, startlingly, that the baby’s hormones were initiating miscarriages.

Who knows what hormonal damage going in there and truncating that natural exchange may cause.

[Guenevere]

bttt

[Lyantana]

If you never had an abortion then why on earth would it be offensive? Don't warn women that they risk an increase of cancer because you don't want anyone to have a thought that you may have had an abortion?

[Faith]

Good info here:

http://www.bcpinstitute.org/ABCUKParliamenttestimony-2007.htm

[TASMANIANRED]

How about class action suits against Big Abortion like they did for Big Tobacco.

[hinckley buzzard]

This connection has been well-established for years. It does not counter the equally well established fact that diseases like cancer are usually multiply determined. There is absolutely no reason for a rational person to be "offended" by the truth. People get lung cancer without smoking too, but that doesn't mean smoking is unrelated to lung cancer.

[hinckley buzzard]

This connection has been well-established for years. It does not counter the equally well established fact that diseases like cancer are usually multiply determined. There is absolutely no reason for a rational person to be "offended" by the truth. People get lung cancer without smoking too, but that doesn't mean smoking is unrelated to lung cancer.