Global Warming as Climastrology

The good news for 2010 is that the climate fraudsters are on the run. The bad news is that they are hoping against hope that the sheriff’s posse won’t catch ‘em. Because the real reason for “global warming” is now clear beyond any reasonable doubt. The reason is ten trillion dollars in taxpayer dough for politicians, transnational bureaucrats, and phony science types. Put away those old world records for the Great Train Robbery and Bernie Madoff. You can junk Bonnie and Clyde. The climate fraudsters have now set the biggest record for massive fraud in human history.

Here’s a guy who built a glittering career on global warming fraud. That BBC headline should have collapsed the whole fraud right there and then. After all, the Bolshie Beeb has been leading this charge for decades. Paul Hudson’s public confession is like Gorbachev finally ‘fessing up that Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Fidel, Kim, Pol Pot (and Obama) had it completely wrong after all. All those 100,000,0000 dead people and nothing to show for it. The Beeb’s Orwellian Ministry of Truth has been pushing global warming every single hour of the day for lo these many years. Now the New York Times actually had to go out and find an honest man to break the news to its readers (John Tierney). Its global frauding correspondent, Andrew Revkin, has resigned and fled the scene of the crime....

Our local TV environmental "reader," Jill Cortis, Channel 3, Sacramento, either is still busy watching reality shows or has the IQ of a banana; in any case she still is encouraging everyone that they should "help with global warming."
Some environmental 'reporter'!

She either has not gotten the memo, or doesn't care.
Either way it smells of indifference or incompetence.

If she’s a young lib,
the driving motivation behind “helping with global warming”

is the desire to “matter” and be significant.

Humans are made with this desire, but it is supposed to cause you to seek your Maker, not to worship the Erf.

A criminal hoax. People used this fraud to obtain money in the form of grants from various states, the US government, charitable foundations and ultimately the taxpayer. This fraud shouldn’t be difficult to prove, one person at a time. Did suspect “A” get money from the government? Did he/she make knowingly false or misleading statements in order to gain that money. If data was falsified or manipulated to facilitate the obtaining of money, the criminal intent is established. If data has been destroyed, those that did so knowing that they had used manipulations based on that data to obtain government money have destroyed evidence. Did suspect “B” act in concert with suspect “A” to accomplish the theft? That’s conspiracy. Criminal investigations need to happen. Firings need to happen.

The fact that there is no criminal investigation is a political matter. No one has the political courage to stand up for the taxpayer by holding these people accountable. Once an investigation is started, the amounts involved will be astronomical. It will result in a taxpayer revolt once people are made to understand what has been done to them.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.