Posted on 01/07/2010 11:51:06 AM PST by kristinn
Edited on 01/07/2010 12:09:06 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
“but did they really start to re-cast it “War On Al Qaeda?” (sic) HOW STUPID.”
“Get it right, “Senator” Obama. We are at WAR WITH RADICAL, FUNDAMENTALIST ISLAMIC TERRORISM. Freaking Unbelievable Amateurish Idiots.”
I WISH they were just being stupid or amateurish.
I believe they are being ideological.
WE are at war with radical, fundamentalist Islamic terrorism, but Obama and the left have made it MORE THAN CLEAR that THEY are not.
Obama is only at war with Al-Qaeda because it is making it more difficult for him to socialize America. He wants them out of the news and is more than willing to send predator drones to kill them if that’s what it takes. And also more than willing to torture innocent airline passengers in the name of increased security.
I don’t think it’s any coincidence at all that the phrase “War against Al-Qaeda” is revealed the same week that we learned Obama has dropped his deadline for sanctions against Iran and won’t be pursuing it after all.
See, clearly that’s because we have nothing to fear from a nuclear Iran. It’s not like they’re violent extremists like Al-Qaeda.
Ironically, the phrase “War against Al-Qaeda” reveals the truth that Obama is FAR LESS SERIOUS about threats to American security than Bush was, yet because it’s the first time in a year he’s used the word “war”, it’s being taken as Obama getting tougher.
Don’t think they’re stupid or amateurish. They just honestly admitted the truth that they believe that we are not at war with Islam, while at the same time having that admission being praised as “getting tough.”
I think it’s pretty clever and not an easy thing to do, that is, to deceive people with the truth.
Al Queda is always five steps ahead of this administration. They’ll pull off something soon and whoever takes credit for it will be anyone BUT Al Queda. At least that would be what I would do if I were involved in fighting for Islam.
I also think it’s VERY strange that X42 just
happened to mosey over to the WH today.
Reminding him of their post-election deal ?
~~~~~~~~~~
A White House official says the meeting is a ‘’check-in’’ visit between the former Democratic president and Obama. Clinton is also expected to see his former White House employee, Rahm Emanuel, who serves as Obama’s chief of staff.
The Oval Office meeting is closed to the press. Obama will meet separately with the former president’s wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, later in the day.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/07/us/politics/AP-US-Obama-Clinton.html
In this case, Obama has been trying to rush it all, IMO. He gave only a few days to do the report. How thorough could it be? He is trying to do one thing only- repair his polling. He is trying to end the discussion of it ASAP.
Lock ‘n Load, Be Ever Vigilant and pray!
Thank you taraytarah, I appreciate your comment!
Don't be so hasty. Obama & the Clintons have a lot in common- they are all trying to keep the same genie in the bottle, and are discovering the concept of unsustainable lies late in life. The 1993 WTC bombing, a halt to the investigation of certain terrorists in 1995 and 1996 by the DoJ, the Aden hotel bombing, Mogadishu, the USS Cole, the USS The Sullivans plot, 9/11 hijackers Khaled al Mihdhar & Nawaf al Hazmi , the bombing of the SS Limberg, Falls Church/VA Jihad/Paintball cell, the Toronto 18 cell, the Yemeni cell from upstate NY, the terror charities cases, the Ft. Hood shooting, and the latest undy bomber attempt have too many common threads for comfort, such as Mr. Anwar al Aulaqi and his friends.
Almost all if not all of those groups are signatories of al Qaeda in that “Jihad Against Crusaders and Jews” pact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.