Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlyVet

Of course the “reporter” couldn’t ask him where was his statistical evidence, that loosening gun restrictions on trained, background-checked, law-abiding citizens, has ever caused anything but a deterrent to crime.


What part of the first amendment is, trained, background check, law abiding found? those words have to have come from the people who will do anything to infringe on the rights of the first amendment, along with permits, liences, etc.

It seems to me you are using the very words of the anti gun activists, i understand you have common sense in mind, but if we use thier reasoning we simply can not win, because they will determine who has a right to keep and bare arms.

If anyone has to belong to a gun club and have training to have the right to keep and bare arms, it is no right what so ever

Its the same as if you would have to be a member of a church to call yourself a christian.


16 posted on 01/09/2010 7:57:20 AM PST by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ravenwolf

No, I’m stating was is required for a permit in AZ. Doesn’t mean I like it. I like Vermont’s idea.


18 posted on 01/09/2010 11:58:04 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson