Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spyone
"declaring attacks on Canada and the United States as attack on Muslims"

Let's see, should we be pleased that some imams are coming out against terrorism, or merely disgusted that the rationale, as always, must be about condemning "attacks on Muslims" -- as though THAT is the reason that terror attacks in North America are evil?

But if there were few if any Muslims here and they all lived in a remote part of Saskatchewan, then Muslims blowing up our people, planes, and cities just wouldn't be any big deal????????
3 posted on 01/08/2010 10:25:33 PM PST by Enchante (Do we really send captured TERRORISTS off to Saudi-land and Yemen so they can be "REHABILITATED"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante

I think what they are implying is that America and Canada should be protected against attack by Muslims as Muslims are also a part of the community in both countries - which is true.

This looks like a positive overture and should be accepted as such.


8 posted on 01/08/2010 10:28:09 PM PST by ZULU (God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

Well, at least they are saying they are happy here...we are always complaining, and me the first to do it, that never one muslims in US are talking against terrorists - for once they do it so let’s keep an open mind. You know me - I am totally against the islamist invasion but if these guys finally would accept to be American before they are muslims and would defend America first..I guess we have at least to listen - if they really mean it and PROVE it then we have to praise them. What do you think?


21 posted on 01/08/2010 10:32:33 PM PST by American Dream 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
Let's see, should we be pleased that some imams are coming out against terrorism, or merely disgusted that the rationale, as always, must be about condemning "attacks on Muslims"

It's a start, and certainly better than anything I have seem from any Muslim group to date. The next step would be condemning terrorism simply because it is terrorism. Without that Islam will remain a belligerent ideology to all humanity.

23 posted on 01/08/2010 10:35:08 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

Either way, ammo up!


47 posted on 01/08/2010 11:00:30 PM PST by b4its2late (Before you can control a horse, you have to break it. Sound familiar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
But if there were few if any Muslims here and they all lived in a remote part of Saskatchewan, then Muslims blowing up our people, planes, and cities just wouldn't be any big deal????????

That is correct, to the extremist mindset.

159 posted on 01/09/2010 5:01:36 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante; knighthawk; little jeremiah; indcons

I noticed that they weren’t concerned about attacks on non-Muslims and they aren’t condemning that aspect of terrorism.

What’s alarming is that they are so concerned that the attacks may harm muslims. Are there that many of them who have infiltrated us so far that it’s become a legitimate concern to them that some muslims might be collateral damage in the event of a terrorist attack?


177 posted on 01/09/2010 6:10:31 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson