Doesn’t change the fact that network broadcasters and their families such as Lou Dobbs and others are being threatened with murder, despite your false characterization of such reports and reporters as a joke.
GOOD BY now.
You have some real nerve, buddy. You must be one of the posters hired by the Dept of Justice to cover for BHO & Rahm & Eric.
GOOD BY.
Hennie Pennie has complained about having their own comments about NEIN and the Canada Free Press “twisted”, made some personal attacks and accusations, and said “Goodbye” in a big Huff. So be it. We’ll proceed without Hennie Pennie.
Suffice it to note, Hennie Pennie made some disparaging comments about the Northeast Intelligence Network and the Canada Free Press while expressing incredulity over their not yet disclosing names and other details provided to them in confidence by the informants.
In response, I noted the fact we already have information in the public domain from the Huffington Post (not to mention other publishers) demonstrating a talk show host and his family, Lou Dobbs, were threatened and actually attacked on multiple occassions with gunshots into their home. Given the obvious nature of the proven threat to the lives of that talk show host and his family, most thinking people I know find it odd anyone would choose to not understand why Northeast Intelligence Network and the Canada Free Press would consider honoring their informants’ requests for protective anonymity and personal safety a priority over public disclosure at this time.
Why would anyone choose to disparage Northeast Intelligence Network and the Canada Free Press for protecting their informants while Lou Dobbs and other have been threatened and put into mortal peril for exercising their free speech?