Yet another Howie column...ping
Scott Brown present in absentee voters’ minds
By Howie Carr | Friday, January 15, 2010 | http://www.bostonherald.com | Columnists
Oh yes, the “stalkers” are out there. Just ask Martha Coakley, the wrinkly attorney general who is not “privy” to the facts of the assault on the reporter on Capitol Hill, or so she says.
Yes, the stalkers are out there, and what they are stalking is the state’s city and town halls, taking absentee ballots. Let’s go straight to the numbers, as of closing time Wednesday afternoon.
We can begin with my own hometown, Wellesley. In one business day, Wednesday, the number of absentee ballots cast went from 741 to 869. Next door, in Weston, the number went from 341 to 437.
Are these Scott Brown voters, or are these moonbats who are voting for Martha Coakley because they’re wondering where the heck did she get that accent, coming from “struggling” North Adams and all?
I’m not saying Scott Brown is going to win Tuesday. All I want to do here is pass on some of the numbers of absentee ballots in various towns over the past 48 hours:
Newton, 1158 as of 5 p.m. Tuesday, to 1490 Wednesday
Plymouth, 787 to 921
Scituate, 407 to 509
Weston, 341 to 437
Weymouth, 537 to 661
It becomes increasingly clear, Scott Brown is winning among the people who work for a living, as opposed to Democrats, who are Martha’s voters.
You want some more absentee numbers, and how they increased from Tuesday until Wednesday?
Marlboro, 738 to 822
Southboro, 159 to 249
Waltham, 517 to 674
Needham, 554 to 699
Falmouth, 1044 to 1194
Chelmsford, 604 to 782
This is one day, mind you. A working day, as opposed to a Democrat day - a Martha Coakley day.
At this point, it’s too late for the Democrats to pull out the absentee vote. Oh sure, the local city and town halls are open today, but in a lot of the Democrat municipalities, the city halls close at noon. Do you know what they call afternoon in the welfare cities?
Morning drive.
Let’s be clear here, Brown-Coakley is a fight between the working classes and the nonworking classes. If you have a job, if you pay your own way, then you’re for Scott Brown. If you’re a moonbat, or a hack, or an illegal alien, or if you have a trust fund or are from New York (or most likely both) then you’re for Martha.
Are the nonparasites of Massachusetts still the majority? We’ll know soon enough.
But look on the bright side, layabouts. If we win, we’ll still have to go to work Wednesday. And you won’t.
Article URL: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1225744
I’m not sure I get Howie’s point here - - is he saying that the increases in absentee ballots is a good thing for Brown? I would think the opposite, that the rats are already stuffing the “absentee” ballots for Coakley. That is, after all, one of the oldest rat tricks in the book. And of course it is a given that the rats will “discover” uncounted boxes of absentee ballots a day after the election, and they will “mysteriously” go Coakley’s way by a large margin.
I just can’t see the rats failing to steal another election, especially in a place like Massachusetts which is rat dominated and (obviously, therefore) corrupt to the core.