Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

Any time I see the letters BCE, I know it is coming from a Christian hating bigot. No other possible reason to use that term.


4 posted on 01/10/2010 10:29:00 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog

Not necessarily Christian-hating, it’s just what’s fashionable now in academia. People will take up the fashion without thinking, or because they are afraid of being censured.

Before the Current Era, makes no sense, because the current era is ‘anno domine’.

But then, academics are slaves to fashion...

At any rate the text is very interesting. I wonder what book of the Old Testament it is part of?

It’s very moving that the concern here is with the poor.


5 posted on 01/10/2010 10:32:47 AM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog
Any time I see the letters BCE, I know it is coming from a Christian hating bigot. No other possible reason to use that term.

What's the problem? BCE just stands for "Before Christian Era." Or at least, so I tell anyone who is adamant about using BCE instead of BC!

6 posted on 01/10/2010 10:33:11 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Hank Gonzales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog

Call me a bigot, eh? Look to the mirror!

What exact day and year was Jesus born, and what is your source for that?


8 posted on 01/10/2010 10:36:12 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog

“Any time I see the letters BCE, I know it is coming from a Christian hating bigot. No other possible reason to use that term.”

All it means is “Before the Christian Era”. Do I hate Christianity if I simply don’t regard its dating as definitive (Before Christ), but its historical emergence as too significant to ignore? The exact birth year of the child who later became known as “Christ” is not known, merely claimed. His date of death (AD) would have had to been a decade and a half later. If you are a Christian, you take that claim as authoritative, and all power to you. If you are not, you take that claim into account because that is the way that Christians date history, and Christians are too important to ignore, while at the same time registering a modicum of skepticism. “Hatred”? Lighten up. Come on.


33 posted on 01/10/2010 11:58:48 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html, http://sites.google.com/site/thevuzvuz/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog; NYer
Any time I see the letters BCE, I know it is coming from a Christian hating bigot. No other possible reason to use that term.

This is a story from Haaretz which is an Israeli news agency. It is to be expected that an Israeli news agency would use BCE and CE rather than BC and AD.

35 posted on 01/10/2010 12:06:12 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog
Any time I see the letters BCE, I know it is coming from a Christian hating bigot. No other possible reason to use that term.

When I was in the Seminary, I actually had a Priest as an instructor taht used that term. He wore a Tau cross, and rarely wore his collar, so that tells you which side of the aisle he voted for.

49 posted on 01/10/2010 2:18:00 PM PST by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson