[Publius6961]

This refutes the argument of those who maintain that Vattel doesn’t amount to anything. It is woven into SCOTUS precedent.

Please show us where exactly Vattel speaks of "logical answers."
Unless it is explicit quoted, it didn't happen.

[Uncle Chip]

Please show us where exactly Vattel speaks of "logical answers." Unless it is explicit quoted, it didn't happen.

It is "understood" by those with logical minds capable of determining the intent of the words of the author -- something that is foreign to the minds of liberals and Obots.