Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldleft
Actually, third world countries tend to do fairly well in earthquakes due to single story construction with lightweight materials.

Do you know anything about the geography of Port-au-Prince? Did you even look at the photo I posted?

123 posted on 01/12/2010 3:36:44 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
Yes, the structures in the picture are not susceptible to collapse and in the event of a collapse they tend not to cause significant injuries. The fact that they're on a hillside is good and bad. Good, because it means that they're not in a liquefaction zone. Bad, because they are vulnerable to landslides.

The big quakes in Mexico City have generally cause high levels of damage in the city center due to liquefaction and high-rise construction whereas the slums do much better.

141 posted on 01/12/2010 4:17:28 PM PST by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson