Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek
Wouldn’t an earthquake under shallow water produce less of a tsunami due to the fact it wouldn’t have to move as much water?

Just days ago I made a similar comment to my husband. I'll be watching the thread to see if someone has an answer (if I don't find it online first). Great minds & all...right?!

54 posted on 01/12/2010 2:45:56 PM PST by zlala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: zlala

The USGS indicates that the epicenter is 10 miles SW of Port Au Prince, which is under the island...not under the ocean. This may limit the chances of a tsunami.


60 posted on 01/12/2010 2:47:58 PM PST by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: zlala

Depends on how deep the fault is. Lots of displaced water.


73 posted on 01/12/2010 2:55:32 PM PST by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: zlala; All

Effects of an earthquake under shallow water. The great Christmas tsunami was so huge because the fault dropped a considerable distance. I think they said 60 feet, along a front dozens of miles long. A lot of water was displaced. As deep water waves move into shallow water, the top water moves faster than the bottom water and causes very high waves to build up.


264 posted on 01/12/2010 9:24:37 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson