[rxsid]

What about that the UIPA request, and the name "Steve Dunham" that was allegedly confirmed by HI as having been born on 8/4/1961?

This is a VERY early developing story so far as I know, but I haven't heard anyone discredit that yet.

[SaraJohnson]

“What about that the UIPA request, and the name “Steve Dunham” that was allegedly confirmed by HI as having been born on 8/4/1961?”

---

This is what the UIPA response was as described in the article you posted:

“In her official response received by email last night, Okubo denied that there is any index data for a vital record of a birth on August 4, 1961 for a “Steve Dunham.” It took her 90 days to figure out how to respond. And that in itself lets you, the reader, know what she meant to say: his name is “Steve Dunham”!”

---

This person says he did not get confirmation on a “Steve Dunham” vital record with the birth date of 8/4/61. Then the author goes on to say this official denial proves she was right - his name is “Steve Dunham.” I don’t understand why this is being discussed.