Posted on 01/16/2010 5:31:42 AM PST by Friendofgeorge
Remember Louise Woodward, the English Nanny convicted in part by Martha Coakley in 1998. People had very strong opinions on the case, many felt she was guilty, I always was sure she was innocent. Well I wonder if many like me missed the recent update to the story. The Prosecutions star medical expert has since reversed his opinion that convicted Woodward, based on fairly new scientific research. The article goes on to suggest that hundreds of innocent people are currently in prison for this FALSE SBS Shaken baby Syndrome. This is related to the current Coakley discussions so I share it with anybody that is interested.
Here`s the link.....
http://searchwarp.com/swa517305-Louise-Woodward-Innocent-Recent-Research-Raises-Reasonable-Doubt.htm#comments
Two British pathologists have found that a combination of injuries used to diagnose SBS abuse, known as the "triad" (swelling, bleeding and oxygen deprivation to the brain), can happen naturally.
Dr Irene Scheimberg (London's Bart's Hospital) and Dr Marta Cohen (Sheffield Children's Hospital) found that bleeding, swelling and oxygen deprivation to the brain can occur without violent shaking. The study found that the symptoms of Shaken Baby Syndrome can happen in babies even before they are taken home from hospital.
Dr. Scheimberg warns that when there "is no evidence of physical abuse (apart from the triad of SBS sypmtoms) we may be sending to jail parents who lost their children through no fault of their own." The doctor went on to state, "As scientists it is our duty to be cautious when we see the triad and to take each case on its merits. We owe it to children and their families."
The doctors looked at 25 babies who had died shortly before delivery and 30 newborns who had brain hemorrhages and found similar damage to the brains of all the babies. The study concluded that the symptoms are common in infants and could be caused by a traumatic birth or other conditions.
There were two groups of children who presented with symptoms similar to SBS - one group had bleeding in the brain caused by normal vaginal delivery and went on to lead normal lives and the other group who also presented with sign of SBS at birth, but did not get well, and whose bleeding continued and actually got worse. Dr. Scheimberg said, "These are the children who the courts suspect have been harmed by their parents (or caregivers)."
The evidence of their study could now be used in a number of appeals in cases where caregivers or parents were prosecuted and jailed for killing infants by shaking them and could finally exonerate Louise Woodward, who many believe she did shake baby Matthew until his brain started to bleed.
The "triad" of symptoms known as Shaken Baby Syndrome was used by the prosecution in the 1998 U.S. trial of British au pair Louise Woodward, who was found guilty of the second-degree murder of eight-month-old Matthew Eappen in October 1997. She was sentenced to a minimum of 15 years to life in prison but the judge overruled that decision and reduced her conviction to involuntary manslaughter. Her sentence was then reduced to time served (279 days) and she was released as a free woman.
In 2007, Dr Patrick Barnes, the prosecution's star medical witness, reversed his medical opinion that convicted Woodward: he concluded that death (of Matthew Eappen) could have been caused by an old injury, as argued by the defense. In a scientific paper he states: "The science we have today could, in fact, have exonerated Louise. There is certainly, in retrospect, reasonable doubt."
There are about 200 cases of Shaken Baby Syndrome diagnosed in Britain every year and an estimated 1,200 to 1,400 cases diagnosed every year in the United States (data from the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome). Many of the childcare givers and mothers who are accused in these cases protest their innocence and deny they did anything harmful to the babies left in their care.
A U.S. physician, Harold E Buttram, notes that many cases of brain hemorrhages are dependent on the strength of the smallest blood vessels at birth, which can be affected by different conditions. He also warns, "Among the many adversities and difficulties facing the American family today, there is a relatively new and growing hazard in which a parent or caretaker may be falsely accused of murdering or injuring an infant by the shaken baby syndrome, when the true cause of death or injury arises from other sources. Very tragically, child abuse does occur and deserves appropriate punishment. However, it is equally tragic when a family, already grieving from the death of their infant, finds a father or mother unjustly accused, convicted, and imprisoned for murder of the infant, a murder of which he or she is innocent."
He explains, "In fact, an infant can die with extensive retinal hemorrhages, a blood clot under the capsule of the brain, extensive bruises, broken bones and sores that will not heal, due to Barlow's disease, without having been subjected to anything but the tenderest of loving care."
This should be interesting to see how this plays out.
Oh, there’s not just this! You have to read Dorothy Rabinowitz’s article on Coakley and the Amirault case. I remember following it in the WSJ at the time it happened. It is incredibly shocking. DR runs it down again this week in the WSJ: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704281204575003341640657862.html
wow.
Thanx for posting that link
Nothing will happen. There’s a stack of prosecutors who trashed defendants in the court and in the press, destroyed their lives and their fortunes, lied, paid liars to offer perjured testimony, and rode the cases to national prominence. To my knowledge, not one of them ever suffered any greater repercussion than having to admit that they might have been mistaken.
Kee McFarlane lied and said she was qualified to interview the children of the McMartin’s school, as well as others. She lied and said that she used proper techniques to gather evidence. She was never even threatened with prosecution for perjury after the facts were known. It was “for the children.” Coakley was another one of these, and therefore she can murder with impunity, “for the children.”
We will all be her victims if she gets in. Another Socialist fanatic. I hope Obama and Clinton go up there and then Brown wins. That would really be priceless.
Seems to depend on the political weight the evildoers carry. The extreme case in which the ****birds doing this stuff did not have the clout to skate by with it involves the town of Wenatchee, Washington state. The last lawsuit against the town was only settled last May. At one point, the town was facing a half billion in lawsuits and was in danger of losing its insurance and being disincorporated.
Yes I read about that in another thread, thanks :)
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Tax Control responded to the thread I posted. Me thinks my thread got hijacked, not a problem it is all related, just that I posted about Woodward.
Give me $1,000,000 and fly this thread to Cuba.
I could tell you what the real answer is but I don’t know how many people would want to hear about it. We need to get rid of the job of DA and the entire “adversarial” system of justice altogether and go to what the French call an “inquisitorial” system in which the only incentive which anybody in the picture has is to figure out what happened. In a rational world, NOBODY would have any sort of money or career incentive to put people in prison.
Dr Irene Scheimberg (London's Bart's Hospital) and Dr Marta Cohen (Sheffield Children's Hospital) found that bleeding, swelling and oxygen deprivation to the brain can occur without violent shaking. The study found that the symptoms of Shaken Baby Syndrome can happen in babies even before they are taken home from hospital.
Dr. Scheimberg warns that when there “is no evidence of physical abuse (apart from the triad of SBS symptoms) we may be sending to jail parents who lost their children through no fault of their own.” The doctor went on to state, “As scientists it is our duty to be cautious when we see the triad and to take each case on its merits. We owe it to children and their families.”
The doctors looked at 25 babies who had died shortly before delivery and 30 newborns who had brain hemorrhages and found similar damage to the brains of all the babies. The study concluded that the symptoms are common in infants and could be caused by a traumatic birth or other conditions.
There were two groups of children who presented with symptoms similar to SBS - one group had bleeding in the brain caused by normal vaginal delivery and went on to lead normal lives and the other group who also presented with sign of SBS at birth, but did not get well, and whose bleeding continued and actually got worse. Dr. Scheimberg said, “These are the children who the courts suspect have been harmed by their parents (or caregivers).”
The evidence of their study could now be used in a number of appeals in cases where caregivers or parents were prosecuted and jailed for killing infants by shaking them and could finally exonerate Louise Woodward, who many believe she did shake baby Matthew until his brain started to bleed.
The “triad” of symptoms known as Shaken Baby Syndrome was used by the prosecution in the 1998 U.S. trial of British au pair Louise Woodward, who was found guilty of the second-degree murder of eight-month-old Matthew Eappen in October 1997. She was sentenced to a minimum of 15 years to life in prison but the judge overruled that decision and reduced her conviction to involuntary manslaughter. Her sentence was then reduced to time served (279 days) and she was released as a free woman.
In 2007, Dr Patrick Barnes, the prosecution's star medical witness, reversed his medical opinion that convicted Woodward: he concluded that death (of Matthew Eappen) could have been caused by an old injury, as argued by the defense. In a scientific paper he states: “The science we have today could, in fact, have exonerated Louise. There is certainly, in retrospect, reasonable doubt.”
There are about 200 cases of Shaken Baby Syndrome diagnosed in Britain every year and an estimated 1,200 to 1,400 cases diagnosed every year in the United States (data from the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome). Many of the childcare givers and mothers who are accused in these cases protest their innocence and deny they did anything harmful to the babies left in their care.
A U.S. physician, Harold E Buttram, notes that many cases of brain hemorrhages are dependent on the strength of the smallest blood vessels at birth, which can be affected by different conditions. He also warns, “Among the many adversities and difficulties facing the American family today, there is a relatively new and growing hazard in which a parent or caretaker may be falsely accused of murdering or injuring an infant by the shaken baby syndrome, when the true cause of death or injury arises from other sources. Very tragically, child abuse does occur and deserves appropriate punishment. However, it is equally tragic when a family, already grieving from the death of their infant, finds a father or mother unjustly accused, convicted, and imprisoned for murder of the infant, a murder of which he or she is innocent.”
He explains, “In fact, an infant can die with extensive retinal hemorrhages, a blood clot under the capsule of the brain, extensive bruises, broken bones and sores that will not heal, due to Barlow's disease, without having been subjected to anything but the tenderest of loving care.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.