Front:
Inside:
Posted on 01/16/2010 12:20:46 PM PST by milwguy
Via Sargent, an extremely sweeping charge from Massachusetts Democratic Party.
The basis is a provision Brown voted for that would allow religious hospital staffers not to inform victims of the availability of the morning after pill.
The NRSC invoked Felix Grucci in response.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Front:
Inside:
[That says it all, doesn’t it?]
Lol, I love it. CHANGE may be happening, just not the way zero intended. Keep praying.
HELP SCOTT DEFEAT THE OBAMA SOCK PUPPET!!
(stole this from another FReeper, but bears repeating)
•People in ANY state can volunteer for the phone bank! http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topics/phone-calls-for-freedom-call-1?commentId=2600775%3AComment%3A1891491&xg_source=activity
•Anyone… Anywhere… Contribute! https://www.icontribute.us/scottbrown
•Live in or near MA? Volunteers still needed at many regional offices. If you can help, please email Laura@brownforussenate.com and she will tell you how.
•If you live in Massachusetts, become an election judge. In Boston they pay $135-$185 and they NEED Republican monitors.
Needed; military and retired law enforcement VFW and police organizations etc to monitor polls- prevent the voter fraud they’re plotting right now. Video tape everything; document everything; prosecute the perpetrators. http://www.cityofboston.gov/news/default.aspx?id=3599
.
Wow
I would have told her to give them to the people she cut in front of.
And double WOW! Lol
Coakley will vote to give illegal immigrants free health care. Coakley will vote to give illegal immigrants your job.
Who are those women in the poster? I notice that the same pics keep repeating themselves. If those are just stock photos or actresses head shots, someone needs to bring that up. If women were actually turned away, or even denied help, surely some real pictures exist somewhere.
Next question: Did coakly get permission from the young ladies to use their photos in her ad?
Excellent points. The first would stop her cold. She'd have no comeback. Anything she'd say would make it worse.
On your second point--wow. And do we even know if these women are victims at all? Looks like a montage of yearbook, facebook or flickr headshots slapped up there.The pics are posed. Not what you'd expect for a victim wall. All young, apparently attractive, w/only one black woman. (She appears several times, but it's the same photo, flipped. Same with the others.) Faces are blurred but still recognizable to anyone familiar with the person to begin with.
I'm thinking the Coakley and the DSSC stepped in it again with the pics. First the WTC and now this,,,real victims who didn't sign a release, or young women whose headshots were used without their knowledge or permission? Very, very possible.
I’m sure they wouldn’t be stupid enough to go around using the actual (blurred) faces of rape victims.
But the “turn them all away” thing is an absolute twisting of the truth - or as regular (non-Democratic) people call it, a lie. (Even the discussion on the Dem website hosting that image is wondering why the Dems would ‘go there,’ and all they can come up with is that she must be waaay down in her latest internals.)
The issue at hand is a piece of legislation Brown sponsored that would allow for health care providers to not provide ‘morning after’ abortifacients if they don’t want to, which has nothing to do with turning people away.
Didn’t see your post before I posted. My thoughts exactly. This could be very bad for Coakley and the DSCC—and not just because of election results.
One Termer Bump!
Self Hating Anti Catholic Bigot
If you look at this woman’s face very closely, she looks like a Kennedy. Maybe some sharp computer wiz can show the similarities in metamophasis.
“Full disclosure: I’m not a Massachusettes Massachusetts resident. I live in California, which is slightly to the right of MA. :) But I AM watching this with great interest, as the implications for the nation as a whole are huge.”
If the Ted Kennedy Senate seat can be won, so can the Barbara Boxer seat be won.
She is an Obama socialist, and the backlash is against precisely that.
Obviously Brown has been effective in vocalizing that; it will take somebody every bit as strong in California.
(And in the CA GOP those are few and far between)
“If the Ted Kennedy Senate seat can be won, so can the Barbara Boxer seat be won.”
I certainly hope so. But I do NOT want that seat going to Fiorina. I am re-registering as a Republican so I can vote for DeVore while I still have the choice (and possibly ensure that I’ll have that choice in November).
If I had to do such an ad, I'd make sure that there were 1,736 squares to give each victim their spot.
Coakly's team has hired students who have failed advertising class. They have disrespected the victims.
The whole thing wouldn’t be an issue if Coakley didn’t let the rapists free.
Especially the ones that rape 2 year olds with a curling iron.
“But I do NOT want that seat going to Fiorina.”
Prefer Boxer over Fiorina, for six more years?
(If it came to that?)
What specific issue positions of hers, do you oppose?
Latest Rasmussen poll. Of the three GOP possibles, Fiorina currently leads, but still short of Boxer. Not much, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.