Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative, independent...and a winner: Kirk for the Republicans (BARF ALERT)
The Chicago Tribune ^ | 2010-01-11 | Unsigned Editorial

Posted on 01/17/2010 10:58:36 AM PST by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: bcsco

Yeah me too. But I’m still going to vote for him, because he’s better than the alternative, and a GOP win might start to break the Democrat stranglehold on this state. I guess we could do worse...


21 posted on 01/17/2010 11:46:43 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
You're gonna for Emmanuel Rahm's bed buddy? I'd stay home than vote for Kirk!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

22 posted on 01/17/2010 11:51:00 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; bigbob

It’s coming down to Hughes for me at this point, but Andrzejewski looks good from his website. But he’s a real dark horse from what I can tell. At this point I’d take either over Kirk.


23 posted on 01/17/2010 11:53:20 AM PST by bcsco (Hey, GOP: The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You're gonna for Emmanuel Rahm's bed buddy? I'd stay home than vote for Kirk!

I'll support whoever survives the primary. If THIS slog gets the seat you won't pry him out with a crowbar. Stay home and that will happen. Democrats have a sense of entitlement to public office in this state. I will not enable it by pouting and sitting out any election. When a voter is convinced that "you can't fight city hall", even though he lives in mid-state, (or in your case, four states away) the bolsheviks gain a permanent lock on the process by partially organizing only a couple, maybe three metro areas. That's gotta stop in Illinois, Kirk or not.

24 posted on 01/17/2010 1:15:59 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; Impy; TheRightGuy; chicagolady; fieldmarshaldj
It's funny how all the Kirk drones claim it be such a great victory for Kirk to "Take back Obama's senate seat" when all the Obama-worshipping media elites that got Hussein elected Senator in the FIRST place are gung-ho to elect Kirk now.

Indeed, just as I predicted, the major Obama cheerleading Chicago media outlets: the Chicago Tribune, Sun-Times and Daily Herald ALL endorsed Kirk this week to be the designated successor of their beloved “rock star” Obama. Out with Roland Burris (he’s embarrassing liberals!), in with Marky (he’ll make socialism sound GOOD)!

The last major Chicago paper still hasn't published an editorial on the Senate race though. Where’s the Obama-loving Southtown Star? Their circulation is mainly southern Cook County so they're the big regional paper. Seems they’re running a bit late with their scheduled glowing endorsement of “fiscal conservative and military expert” Mark Kirk. Did the editorial written for them by Kirk staffers get lost in the mail? Let’s get cracking, people!

9 out of 10 Obama-touting Chicago media sources agree: If you liked Obama, you’ll LOVE Mark Kirk!

25 posted on 01/17/2010 1:46:50 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; fieldmarshaldj

The Chicago Tribune calls Mark Kirk “conservative”. They also claimed George Ryan was “conservative” during his reign in office. I have to shake my head and wonder what planet the Tribune editorial writers live on. They’re even nuttier than than the british list of American “conservatives”.


26 posted on 01/17/2010 1:50:22 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Kirk’s ads talk of a “different kind of GOP leadership”.


27 posted on 01/17/2010 1:52:54 PM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yongin

Yes, his leader is different. Mark Kirk is from the Democrat wing of the Republican Party. The Senate Republicans need more unofficial Democrats since Arlen Specter became an official Democrat, and Marky is more than pleased to take over where Specter left off.


28 posted on 01/17/2010 2:52:18 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Impy; yongin

They seem to have misspelled “Liberal, Democrat and a loser: Mark Kirk.” I will endorse Alexi the crook before that execrable scumbag, because at least he’s HONEST about being a member of the Marxist party. Kirk doesn’t even reach that level. Alexi will be going to prison soon, so we’ll have another election shortly, and hopefully next time, we’ll get it right.


29 posted on 01/17/2010 3:46:17 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Rumor has it that one of Alexi's primary opponents, (namely Chicago Inspector General David Hoffman, one of Daley's goons) is going to leave his anti-Alexi website up and running if Alexi wins the primary:

http://www.dontbankonalexi.com/

Check it out. Even the Chicago RATs know Alexi is a joke. Obama hasn't endorsed his former basketball buddy yet either, compared to the running ads for him early and often in 2006. I bet a number of Chicago machine RATs pull the level for Marky Mark hoping to get a marxist installed for the long-term.

30 posted on 01/17/2010 4:07:18 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Either way, a crooked Combiner will be in that seat, and it’s better that it just be an honestly-declared rodent instead of a covert one.


31 posted on 01/17/2010 4:44:19 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; rabscuttle385; yongin; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; PhilCollins; bigbob; chicagolady
You guys need to get out the truth about Kirk to IL GOP primary voters and do it fast!

We have a smidge of a problem. Which candidate to back. Judge Don Lowrey is the best candidate. Millionaire Partick Hughes has a terrible presence as a candidate but the money and organization, he claims only he can overtake Kirk.

Kirk would be toast if a top tier conservative had run.

As to the Trib, they also advise combiner Andy McKenna for Governor and Judy Topinko for Comproller! They are not fit to line bird cages at this point. The bird might learn to read and then vomit uncontrollably.

The Sun Slimes also backs Kirk and the worst candidate for Governor in my option, Kirk Dillard who basically endorsed Obama for President, and Topkino. Ill freepers don't forgot about the Comptroller's race! Vote for Conservative Bill Kelly.

32 posted on 01/18/2010 8:02:34 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Impy; goldstategop

We don’t have a problem. The best candidate, in Illinois’ U.S. Senate race, is Don Lowery, the conservative, in that race, who has the most political experience. He’s pro-life, pro-gun, pro-tax cuts, pro-spending cuts, and anti-illegal alien. He was a judge for 26 years. He was in the army, with tours in Korea and Vietnam. Please read his site, www.JudgeLowery4USsenate.com. Hughes’ money and organization hasn’t helped his campaign, very much, so they probably won’t help him, within the next two weeks.


33 posted on 01/18/2010 8:27:34 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

Yeah we do, the conservative vote is gonna be split. Hugues should quit and endorse Lowrey but that isn’t gonna happen.


34 posted on 01/18/2010 9:22:15 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Hughes is portraying himself as the true conservative.

Kirk is th front runner because the media loves him (at least until the general election) and the IL GOP is seen as a haven for crooks (George Ryan & Jim Thompson) and flakes (Alan Keyes & Jim Oberweis).


35 posted on 01/18/2010 9:26:00 AM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: yongin

Hughes is a conservative. He says the right things.

But man does he say them in monotone robotic fashion. He needs public speaking and debate lessons.


36 posted on 01/18/2010 9:29:11 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Impy

We shouldn’t have a problem. All Illinois conservatives should vote for Lowery.


37 posted on 01/18/2010 9:47:56 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson