Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does Coakley Want to Raise Taxes on Families with Special-Needs Kids?
Americans for Tax Reform ^ | Thursday, January 14, 2010 | Ryan Ellis

Posted on 01/19/2010 4:22:42 PM PST by U of IL Conservative

Americans for Tax Reform today challenged Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley to defend her support for a tax increase on families with special-needs children. Coakley has endorsed the Senate healthcare bill, which contains a new cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs)--disproportionately raising taxes on these families.

Under current law, there is no legal cap on FSA contributions. Most people defer $10 or $20 per paycheck to pay for eyeglasses, co-payments, and non-prescription medication. Many families, however, defer thousands of dollars per year into FSAs to pay for special needs education on a pre-tax basis. The Senate healthcare bill’s $2500 FSA cap won’t affect typical families, but it will especially impact families with special-needs children.

“Martha Coakley supports this tax increase on special-needs kids because she only cares about, in her words, ‘getting taxes up,’ said ATR President Grover Norquist. “Maybe she should put her loyalty to Washington bureaucrats aside for the moment and stop to consider the pain she is causing for families with special-needs children.” ....

========> Check out full piece (from Thursday!) at ATR.org....

(Excerpt) Read more at atr.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coakley; ma2010; marthacoakley; scottbrown
I am so SORRY for not posting this here, at the end of last week (instead of at the end of Election Day)!... Fortunately though, I think many people saw my other postings of it then; I have never before had anything "Re-Tweet"-ed so many times!

Despite how late it is (who knows? - Maybe this will be dragged out... Though hopefully Scott Brown will be declared the winner, later tonight!) - Could you please help propel this piece, so everyone has this information?

[There's a second pertinent one, that I also wanted to share; I'll publish it next, in a new thread.]

|| Digg || Delicious || StumbleUpon || Reddit ||


|| Twitter || Facebook ||

Thanks, and on to VICTORY tonight!!

1 posted on 01/19/2010 4:22:42 PM PST by U of IL Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: U of IL Conservative

this has always been a STUPID STUPID program!!!!!!!!!!!!

a HIDEOUS EXAMPLE OF BUREACRACY GONE AMOK

You put money aside, in tyhe governments hands, so that at the end of the year they can give it back to you IF YOU MEET their regulations and fll out minldess paperwork reporting what you purchased that ‘qualifies’ to the government

Why not just make the medical ‘qualified’ expenses deductable when you do your taxes? what... too easy? not enough bureacrats empoloed to oversee it?


2 posted on 01/19/2010 4:29:29 PM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
With all due respect:

YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE HECK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!

An “HSA” is NOT, an “MSA” -— with an HSA you do NOT have to give the money back, there is no “use it or lose it” in the HSA PLAN!

It is a BRILLIANT idea and you need to study the issue a bit, before you spout off here.

Also, even the MSA makes sense, for those responsible enough to figure out how to use it!

The HSA attracts those of us who are self employed. I am 51 years old, and I carry a High Deductable health insurance plan. I can then put lots of money into my HSA every year, and use that money for the deductables and co-insurance, if needed.

My Health Insurance premium is about $102.00 a month. I carry a $5,000.00 deductable. It is the SMARTEST thing anyone can do.

I am a CFP
I am a Health Insurance Agent.
I am self employed.
I have an HSA.
I have a disabled Grand Daughter.

Dems who do not like HSA plans are scum.

You, on the other hand, I am hoping you are only misinformed!

3 posted on 01/19/2010 4:37:55 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
You, on the other hand, I am hoping you are only misinformed!

probably, but i still dont like having the government tell you where to put your money, preventing your use of it, unless you spend it on what they 'approve'

4 posted on 01/19/2010 5:01:48 PM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: U of IL Conservative

Because she’s a Demmycrat?


5 posted on 01/19/2010 5:08:15 PM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

FSAs are great, especially from a cash-flow standpoint. My wife has severe cardiopulmonary & other disorders (4 open-heart surgeries by the time she was 23) and I put over five grand in this year.


6 posted on 01/19/2010 5:21:07 PM PST by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Like IRA’s??

Actually, an HSA is BETTER than an IRA, you deduct 100% of what you contribute to it, and what you remove is TAX FREE if it is for a broad range of “health” expenses!

7 posted on 01/19/2010 5:24:58 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
To be polite, it's a question of ciphering. If I can set aside income that is untaxed, and use that for medical expenses, that's better than any "deduction".

In a time of low interest rates the value may escape your attention. In a time of high interest rates, and iron enforcement of withholding rules, you can see the difference.

Right now it's not a hill of beans difference.

Self-employed people have a different formula to work with, but it amounts to the same thing. $3,500 untaxed and used throughout the year is worth more than $3,500 as a deduction at the end of the tax year.

8 posted on 01/19/2010 5:32:59 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"preventing your use of it, unless you spend it on what they 'approve'"

You mean like insurance companies, right?

9 posted on 01/19/2010 5:55:55 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson