Oh, they heard it, Lanny, but you, like most libs, don't want to talk about tradeoffs, about the other side of the equation. In this case, that means higher taxes, more government intervention in your life, and, for the elderly, reduced Medicare benefits. Davis makes the typical, one-sided left-wing argument that refuses to weigh what you get against what you give up, and concentrates your aim only on what you get. Like the entire "pro-choice" movement that says that a woman should have the right to choose what to do with her own body, while completely denying the right of the human being living inside her to exist.
Not to mention that Lanny leaves out is what the democrats are REALLY offering: everyone gets insurance but it is CRAPPY insurance (doctor shortages, killing innovation in our medical industry, death panels and rationing, etc). This is the kind of insurance that if your employer offered it to you, you would likely seek an alternative somewhere else. Except under the democrats plan there are no alternatives. Finally, in order for everyone to get the crappy insurance we get to kill off Mom, Dad, Grandma and Grandpa or those that just happen to get too sick.
Typical democrat plan, instead of lifing everyone up, the left brings everyone down and calls it “equality.”
[If our bill passes, you never have to worry about getting, or losing, health insurance ]
Don’t have to worry about getting? Huh? I thought you got fined/taxed if you didn’t get a Democrat approved plan. That’s enough to make anybody worry.