Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b

“””On the surface, Brown’s success, especially among independents, suggests that the GOP tent is expanding to make room even for moderate, pro-choice candidates like Brown. Have fiscal conservatives displaced social conservatives as the base?...””””


Journalists are so full of themselves.

Brown’s success was due to Obama’s weakness and nothing more. Brown is an energetic politician whose sole platform was opposition to Obama. A dog catcher could have run on the same platform and won.

The GOP may need to let abortionists from Massachusetts into the tent, but not elsewhere.


8 posted on 01/20/2010 5:55:49 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Presbyterian Reporter

Brown’s abortion stance is disappointing to say the least, but not nearly as disgusting as Martha “I love baby-killing” Coakley.


11 posted on 01/20/2010 6:02:35 AM PST by Elvina (BHO is doubleplus ungood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

His platform was opposition to the Deomocrats, not just Obama. He campaigned on lowering taxes, cutting spending, a strong military and anti-Obama healthcare reform. If that isn’t conservative enough for some here on FR then I suggest they move over to a fringe third party and enjoy themselves in their negativity. It’s stunning how little some here grasp the realities of party politics. It’s also amazing how dismissive some are of his election. No, a dog-catcher could not have won...


15 posted on 01/20/2010 6:05:51 AM PST by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson