Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/22/2010 12:29:25 AM PST by DTAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DTAD
Muslim and religious freedom groups

No. Marxists, Islamists, antiwar pressure groups and their pals in the press created a phony controversy.

2 posted on 01/22/2010 12:31:30 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DTAD

There is nothing about the verses on the gun sights for them to compromise principles and back off from.


3 posted on 01/22/2010 12:34:21 AM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DTAD

What an enormous steaming, stinking, festering pile of Bravo Sierra! And how small of the head shed to take such a tone.

“...The coded descriptions are not obvious, appearing in raised lettering immediately following the stock number on the metal casing of the gunsights. The scopes use tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, to create light and help shooters aim at their target.”

Tritium....a very long lasting light indeed

“...Among the markings on the Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight were JN8:12, an apparent reference to John 8:12: “Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.”...” Perfect words for a perfect sentiment, and could just have easily been words from a sales brochure “Warriors using this sight will be able to see!”

The practice raised alarm because it broke a US military rule that strictly prohibits “proselytizing of any religion, faith or practice” in Iraq and Afghanistan, both Muslim nations.

Yeah, whatever, again, rather a small-of-character tack to take.

The upside? Maybe a bunch of these sights will be dumped into DRMO and from there, the market. Might actually be able to afford one!

cool


5 posted on 01/22/2010 1:15:18 AM PST by petro45acp (Free Republic, the only thing working on this sorry Bagram interweb thingy! Thanks Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DTAD
mmm mmm mmm. What would Uncle Ted think of this!
6 posted on 01/22/2010 1:19:01 AM PST by weldAllday (Elections have Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DTAD

The fact that the Pentagon is falling all over themselves to denounce the sight’s inscription is truly pathetic. This is a non-issue if ever there was one. The hard left, atheistic, anti-military, gun banners are “offended” and couch their faux concern as worry over inciting jihadis who are caught in Trijicon’s illuminated crosshairs:
...exhale...pause...relax...squeeze...squeeze...squeeze...BAM! Now nobody’s offended. Problem solved.


7 posted on 01/22/2010 2:31:38 AM PST by CharlesThe Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson