Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman

They’d have to really adjust the rules. Americans won’t take to a game that can take 3 days to play only to wind up in a tie. It’d have to be over, start to finish, in 3.5 - 4 hours or less.


14 posted on 01/24/2010 5:56:24 AM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (A moderate muslim is one who is simply buying time to reload..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeorgiaDawg32; cardinal4

I spent five years in Britain. Got to be a fanatic follower of Leeds United, Liverpool, inter alia. During the summers I TRIED to watch cricket and understand the game. After almost five years I still couldn’t figure out which side was winning. Some matches can go on for days. They have one-day matches as well and one can usually tell who won. I never saw any hooliganism at a cricket match.


20 posted on 01/24/2010 6:02:15 AM PST by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
It’d have to be over, start to finish, in 3.5 - 4 hours or less.

20/20, the form of cricket being discussed here, does precisely that - and that's why the IPL believes that, unlike the more traditional forms of the game, 20/20 may have a chance in the US. 40 6-ball overs maximum, and it's all over. (That and the very large sums of money the IPL has at its disposal.)

51 posted on 01/24/2010 9:39:45 AM PST by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson