To: thackney
Is this saying that the existing refineries are under-utilized?
I had been thinking we did not have enough refining capacity.
To: Repeal The 17th
From the point of view of the energy companies this is bad news. From the consumer standpoint, it is good news. It means we have excess capacity whereas before we were stretched to the limit. Less demand in a down economy also works against rises in price.
To: Repeal The 17th
To: thackney
Is this saying that the existing refineries are under-utilized?
I had been thinking we did not have enough refining capacity
We were being told we did not have enough refining capacity......
11 posted on
01/24/2010 5:39:59 PM PST by
Freddd
(CNN is not credible.)
To: Repeal The 17th
I had been thinking we did not have enough refining capacity. We didn't. But, come the recession, demand fell like a stone.
Refineries are high capital operations that need to run at a high percentage of capacity to be profitable. But pushing them into the 97-98% range, as we were, was dangerous, too.
12 posted on
01/24/2010 5:41:28 PM PST by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: Repeal The 17th
Currently our refineries are under-utilized. This is following several years of rather significant refinery expansion, combined with falling demand in the downturn economy.
We still import refined products. It can be cheaper to import gasoline and diesel, than to import crude oil and submit to US regulation and taxes.
14 posted on
01/24/2010 5:44:53 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson