[MattinNJ]

That’s a tough one. Personal loyalty vs. personal beliefs. I doubt she made the choice with her future in mind and decided she owed mcCain. FWIW, she’s also backing the wrong horse in the Texas governor race. She’s back perry out of loyalty and friendship but Medina (sp?) is the real conservative and could actually win if Palin endorsed her and increased her name recognition.

[mnehring]

Personal loyalty vs. personal beliefs

No one is considering the possibility of contractual obligations as well?

BTW, Medina is no Conservative, she is an open borders Libertarian at best.

[mulligan]

Medina would be about as bad as Obama.

[rob777]

"She’s back perry out of loyalty and friendship but Medina (sp?) is the real conservative and could actually win if Palin endorsed her and increased her name recognition."


If so, I have a bigger problem with this move. As much as I disagree with McCain, I understand that Sarah felt a sense of personal loyalty to him for "bringing her to the dance". The same cannot be said in supporting Perry. She needs to make such decisions based on what each candidate stands for, rather than how she feels personally about each candidate. Supporting political figures based on personal feelings for them is what creates an "old boys" network. In the long run. The personality over principle approach can only succeed in replacing one group of insiders with another.