To: WOBBLY BOB
Only a few problems with this. Of all the "five" McCain received the least amount of money from Keating. After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined in 1991 that Alan Cranston, Dennis DeConcini, and Donald Riegle had substantially and improperly interfered with the FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings, with Cranston receiving a formal reprimand. Senators John Glenn and John McCain were cleared of having acted improperly but were criticized for having exercised "poor judgment." Sorry, guys, but this retread from 1989 is NOTHING compared to the $121,000 Hayworth accepted from Abramoff.
3 posted on
01/28/2010 11:24:43 AM PST by
jyoders19
To: jyoders19
This is just what the left wants- Republicans arguing over which Republican is the most corrupt.
To: jyoders19
Is that you again, Juan?
7 posted on
01/28/2010 11:31:51 AM PST by
MBB1984
To: jyoders19
Has Hayworth ever co-authored a bill against free speech?(McCain-Feingold) ?
8 posted on
01/28/2010 11:34:41 AM PST by
WOBBLY BOB
(ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
To: jyoders19
Yes, hard to support the title of “most reprehensible of the Keating Five” when others got convicted of criminal acts and he got a reprimand for poor judgment.
I mean, to hell with McCain; but why the need to misrepresent the truth?
19 posted on
01/28/2010 1:06:16 PM PST by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
To: jyoders19
I was going to point out that Hayworth was completely exonerated by the USDOJ, but you’ve already been zotted, so goodbye and good riddance, you McCainiac piece of sh*t!
20 posted on
01/28/2010 1:23:27 PM PST by
mkjessup
(If you admire, support and make excuses for RINOs (like John McCain) that makes YOU a RINO!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson