| I'll give you a hint. I'm on the side that stands for upholding the rule of law - the rule not evaluated by a single man who advocates taking matters into his own hand and dispensing justice as he sees fit Oh really? What would you do if you had the chance in the 1920s?
|
Are we dipping into the past now to make our point? If that’s the case, I can see some of these moral relativist Freepers saying, “Nothing wrong with slavery if it makes Tiller a slave,” or “Nothing wrong with crematoriums if Tiller’s in one of them!”
Silly rabbit, Third Reich Germany wasn't a nation of laws, but a nation beholden to the musings of one psychopathic murder. We are a nation of laws - laws written for, of and by the people and interpreted by a Judiciary, per their Constitutional responsibilities. We don't get to start murdering people when those decisions don't go the way we think that they should.
