Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BAW
It was reported that they sought access to and went into the phone wiring closet. That would be trouble if true.

If not, the policeman who wrote it up should be questioned and the person who made that claim should be charged with providing false information.

I'm not aware of any "impersonating a phone repairman" statutes, as long as they didn't touch the phone system.

33 posted on 01/29/2010 8:50:22 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dead

And what happened to the fourth guy who wasn’t in court?


45 posted on 01/29/2010 9:08:55 AM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a keynote speaker at a Wellstone memorial...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dead

According to the charging document, they asked about the phone ‘closet’, and were directed to the GSA office in the building that controls access to places like that. They were not given access, and did not go there.


79 posted on 01/29/2010 10:51:38 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dead

Here the FBI agent’s Affidavit:

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/012610_affidavit.pdf


81 posted on 01/29/2010 11:00:56 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson