First: Don’t change the title of the article. The proper title is “Jury Finds Man Guilty of Murder in Kansas Abortion Provider’s Death”. Use it - those are the rules.
Second: Roeder admitted he did it. He claimed that he did it to save more babies from being slaughtered, but he admitted he did it.
Roeder did the crime, he’ll do the time.
My opinion: A killer killed a killer. If we were to have people kill in disregard for the law - as bad as the law is - we’d have anarchy that would dwarf even the horror of abortion.
Playing devil's advocate here - If Roeder had shot a perp who was going to kill another person, one who was lucky enough to have made it out of the womb alive, would he have been found guilty of murder?
He killed a mass murderer. The man was stopped from killing innocent children. Guilty for murder is the right and only verdict.
We already have anarchy. It is called Roe v Wade, which in the guise of law, and yet utterly antithetical to it, removed the protection of law from a whole class of human beings.
Cordially,
“My opinion: A killer killed a killer. If we were to have people kill in disregard for the law - as bad as the law is - we’d have anarchy that would dwarf even the horror of abortion.”
You are joking right? Fifty million deaths at the hands of abortionists and you think killing a few of their murdering bunch is more dangerous than that? Get a reality check...